XVIII The History Of Poynings’ Law, 1615–41
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9983751 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Aidan Clarke (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1972 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Fascículo | 70 |
| Páginas | 207-222 |
| Data de publicação | 1972-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Irish Historical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0021-1214 • E-ISSN: 2056-4139 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021121400027875 |
| OpenAlex | W2496706676 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
Thirty years ago, in a magisterial study of the early operation of Poynings’ Law, Professor R. Dudley Edwards and Professor T.W. Moody noted that ‘the primary dividing-line in the history of the law falls between the parliaments of 1613–15 and 1634–5’. Previously, they showed, it had curtailed the Irish executive and enjoyed the approval of the Irish parliament; only subsequently, they argued, was it used as a means of enabling the government to control parliament. The purpose of the present study is to develop that argument by examining both the way in which Lord Deputy Wentworth took advantage of altered circumstances to reierse the statute’s function in 1634–5 and the way in which members of the Irish parliament unsuccessfully campaigned to restore the traditional interpretation of its provisions in 1640–41
Government (linguistics · Interpretation (philosophy · Irish · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Statute · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Irish and British Studies · Law · Philosophy · Scottish History and National Identity
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,12 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1992 - 2018 (27) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |