James Shanteau
Biographic Data
| ID | 114336 |
|---|---|
| NAME | James Shanteau |
| GIVEN NAMES | James |
| FAMILY NAME | Shanteau |
| SIGNATURE | SHANTEAU J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Kansas State University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7995-3442 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 29 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 11 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1975 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Information integration in person perception
This chapter presents some of the key findings from research conducted within the basic person perception paradigm. The preceding sections of this chapter have traced the development and expansion of the Information Integration Theory approach to impression formation. Traditionally, the study of impression formation has been associated with the person perception task. In this task, individuals are presented with personality trait information abou…
The futility of decision making research
We have each spent more than 50 years doing research that has had little impact. Even more lamentable is that our field, judgment and decision making (JDM), has on the whole had little impact during that span. We attribute that failure to the use of methodologies that emphasize testing models rather than looking for differences in behavior. The "cognitive revolution" led the field astray, toward the goal of studying model fit rather than comparin…
Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research
Using stories to battle unintentional injuries
People who judge people
Experts who judge people usually provide opinions. It can be challenging to evaluate the professional performance of those experts, because for many domains there is no applicable external standard against which to verify the opinions. We review traditional methods for assessment and propose the purely empirical CWS approach as an alternative. Expert judgment entails discriminating among the various stimuli within the domain as well as being cons…
Competence in experts
Expert Judgment
Two groups of professional auditors (expert ns = 10 and 11) and one group of 11 accounting students (novices) made judgments for 32 hypothetical auditing cases which were based on 8 dimensions of accounting-related information. Analyses indicated that the experts did not differ significantly from the novices in the number of significant dimensions; both the professionals and the students had roughly three significant factors. When evaluating the …
Probability of acceptance in dating choice
Weak inference with linear models
Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information
Two empirical studies are reported in which tests are conducted between adding and averaging combination rules for evaluative judgments. The results indicate that attribute information combines by averaging. Multi-attribute models which assume adding are contradicted by the findings, and thus, provide an inadequate description of consumers' psychological processes
An Information-Integration Analysis of Risky Decision Making
Commentaries on Bettman, Capon, and Lutz
Journal Article Commentaries on Bettman, Capon, and Lutz Get access James Shanteau, James Shanteau Kansas State University, Department of Psychology Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar C. Michael Troutman, C. Michael Troutman Kansas State University, Department of Psychology Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Gerrit Wolf Gerrit Wolf Yale University Search for…
Probability of acceptance in dating choice
Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information
Two empirical studies are reported in which tests are conducted between adding and averaging combination rules for evaluative judgments. The results indicate that attribute information combines by averaging. Multi-attribute models which assume adding are contradicted by the findings, and thus, provide an inadequate description of consumers' psychological processes
Weak inference with linear models
An Information-Integration Analysis of Risky Decision Making
Commentaries on Bettman, Capon, and Lutz
Journal Article Commentaries on Bettman, Capon, and Lutz Get access James Shanteau, James Shanteau Kansas State University, Department of Psychology Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar C. Michael Troutman, C. Michael Troutman Kansas State University, Department of Psychology Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Gerrit Wolf Gerrit Wolf Yale University Search for…
Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information
Two empirical studies are reported in which tests are conducted between adding and averaging combination rules for evaluative judgments. The results indicate that attribute information combines by averaging. Multi-attribute models which assume adding are contradicted by the findings, and thus, provide an inadequate description of consumers' psychological processes
Weak inference with linear models
Probability of acceptance in dating choice
Expert Judgment
Two groups of professional auditors (expert ns = 10 and 11) and one group of 11 accounting students (novices) made judgments for 32 hypothetical auditing cases which were based on 8 dimensions of accounting-related information. Analyses indicated that the experts did not differ significantly from the novices in the number of significant dimensions; both the professionals and the students had roughly three significant factors. When evaluating the …
Competence in experts
People who judge people
Experts who judge people usually provide opinions. It can be challenging to evaluate the professional performance of those experts, because for many domains there is no applicable external standard against which to verify the opinions. We review traditional methods for assessment and propose the purely empirical CWS approach as an alternative. Expert judgment entails discriminating among the various stimuli within the domain as well as being cons…
Using stories to battle unintentional injuries
Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research
Information integration in person perception
This chapter presents some of the key findings from research conducted within the basic person perception paradigm. The preceding sections of this chapter have traced the development and expansion of the Information Integration Theory approach to impression formation. Traditionally, the study of impression formation has been associated with the person perception task. In this task, individuals are presented with personality trait information abou…
The futility of decision making research
We have each spent more than 50 years doing research that has had little impact. Even more lamentable is that our field, judgment and decision making (JDM), has on the whole had little impact during that span. We attribute that failure to the use of methodologies that emphasize testing models rather than looking for differences in behavior. The "cognitive revolution" led the field astray, toward the goal of studying model fit rather than comparin…
Computer Science (11 works) · Psychology (11 works) · Cognitive psychology (5 works) · Cognition (4 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works)