Lori Frank
Biographic Data
| ID | 5543303 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lori Frank |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lori |
| FAMILY NAME | Frank |
| SIGNATURE | FRANK L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0023-7003 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures
Given empirical evidence of response shift, there is a critical need for guidelines and knowledge translation to avoid potential misinterpretations of PROM results and consequential biases in decision-making. Our framework with guiding questions provides a structure for developing strategies to address potential impacts of response shift at micro-, meso-, and macro-levels
Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again
The evaluation framework and the underlying conceptual model are supported by results to date. PCORI will continue to assess the effects of engagement as the funded projects progress toward completion, dissemination, and uptake into clinical decision making
Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute
PCORI requires engagement of stakeholders in the research it funds. In addition PCORI engages stakeholders in activities including review of funding applications and establishment of CER research infrastructure through PCORnet. The comprehensive approach to engagement is being evaluated to help guide the field toward promising practices in research engagement
Raising the Bar for Self-reported Health Status
L.F. was employed full time by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute while completing this manuscript, and continues to be employed there. The views expressed in this article are those of Dr. Frank and do not necessarily reflect those of PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee. Reprints: Lori Frank, PhD, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 1828 L Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. E-mail: [email protected]
Primary care providers' experiences with trauma patients
Depression and Health-related Quality of Life for Low-income African-American Women in the U.S
No prominent works on this page.
Depression and Health-related Quality of Life for Low-income African-American Women in the U.S
Primary care providers' experiences with trauma patients
Raising the Bar for Self-reported Health Status
L.F. was employed full time by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute while completing this manuscript, and continues to be employed there. The views expressed in this article are those of Dr. Frank and do not necessarily reflect those of PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee. Reprints: Lori Frank, PhD, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 1828 L Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. E-mail: [email protected]
Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute
PCORI requires engagement of stakeholders in the research it funds. In addition PCORI engages stakeholders in activities including review of funding applications and establishment of CER research infrastructure through PCORnet. The comprehensive approach to engagement is being evaluated to help guide the field toward promising practices in research engagement
Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again
The evaluation framework and the underlying conceptual model are supported by results to date. PCORI will continue to assess the effects of engagement as the funded projects progress toward completion, dissemination, and uptake into clinical decision making
Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures
Given empirical evidence of response shift, there is a critical need for guidelines and knowledge translation to avoid potential misinterpretations of PROM results and consequential biases in decision-making. Our framework with guiding questions provides a structure for developing strategies to address potential impacts of response shift at micro-, meso-, and macro-levels
Medicine (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Nursing (5 works) · Public health (4 works) · Quality of Life Research (4 works) · Political science (3 works) · Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Alternative medicine (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works)