Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dragging and Confirming

Bibliographic Data

ID10694653
AuthorsMatthew Kotzen (0000-0003-0305-4736, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume121
Issue1
Pages55-93
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/00318108-1426364
OpenAlexW2023223828
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited23

This essay addresses the question of when evidence for a stronger claim H1 also constitutes evidence for a weaker claim H2. Although the answer “Always” is tempting, it is false on a natural Bayesian conception of evidence. This essay first describes some prima facie counterexamples to this answer and surveys some weaker answers and rejects them. Next, it proposes an answer, which appeals to the “Dragging Condition.” After explaining and arguing for its use of the Dragging Condition, the essay argues that the Dragging Condition provides a general account of, and solution to, the counterexamples with which the essay began. The essay briefly discusses the relevance of the Dragging Condition to the recently much-discussed topic of “transmission failure” in epistemology, applies the Dragging Condition to the problem of “bootstrapping” in epistemology, and discusses three important objections to the view defended in the essay

Bootstrapping (finance) · Counterexample · Econometrics · Economics · Epistemology · Natural (archaeology) · Political science · Prima facie · Relevance (law) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • How to Think about Indirect Confirmation

    Open Access•Brian Mcloone•Erkenntnis•2025

  • The Bayesian explanation of transmission failure

    Open Access•Geoff Pynn•Synthese•2013

  • Contextualism about Evidential Support

    Open Access•Jessica Brown•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Why I Am Not a Boltzmann Brain

    Sinan Dogramaci, Miriam Schoenfield•The Philosophical Review•2025

  • Problems for Dogmatism

    Open Access•Roger White•Philosophical Studies•2006

  • What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?

    Open Access•James Pryor•Philosophical Issues•2004

  • I—Crispin Wright

    Open Access•Crispin Wright•Aristotelian Society Supplementary…•2004

  • Aspects of Scientific Explanation

    Carl Gustav Hempel•Aspects of Scientific Explanation•1970

  • Epistemic Permissiveness

    Open Access•Roger White•Philosophical Perspectives•2005

  • Weinberg on QFT

    Open Access•J Bain•Synthese•1998

  • On having no reason

    Open Access•Peter Kung•Synthese•2010

  • Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability

    Open Access•Ian Hacking•Philosophy of Science•1967

  • When Transmission Fails

    Christopher J Tucker, Christopher Tucker•The Philosophical Review•2010

  • Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge

    Open Access•Stewart Cohen•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2002

  • Change in View

    Kent Bach, Gilbert Harman•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988

  • (Anti‐)Sceptics Simple and Subtle

    Open Access•Crispin Wright•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2002

  • Fact, fiction, and forecast

    Nelson Goodman•Fact, fiction, and forecast•1983

  • Transfer of Warrant, Begging the Question and Semantic Externalism

    Helen Beebee•The Philosophical Quarterly•2001

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,31
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae