Contracting Out and Accountability
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11961396 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard Mulgan (0000-0003-2610-429X, Australian National University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1997 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 106-116 |
| Data de publicação | 1997-12-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Periódico | Australian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb02493.x |
| OpenAlex | W2053649557 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 15 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
Governments are increasingly moving to contract out the provision of public services which have previously been delivered by public service departments. Contracting out typically implies provision by private sector contractors. However, it may also include in‐house provision by public service departments or other public agencies where the right to provide is won through competitive tendering and is governed by contract. At the Commonwealth level, the trend has been given added impetus by the Coalition government elected in 1996 (Reith J 996; National Commission of Audit 1996). The main rationale for contracting out is to improve efficiency in service provision by harnessing the virtues of competition, in particular the superior productivity engendered among competitive providers (Industry Commission (IC) 1996, B3.4; Appendix E). At the same time, there is a legitimate expectation that providers of public services paid for by public funds will be publicly accountable (IC 1996, BI). However, contracting out has the potential to reduce the extent of public accountability by transferring the provision of public services to members of the private sector who are generally not subject to the same accountability requirements as public officials. Indeed, reduction in such accountability requirements may be one of the reasons for the greater efficiency of the private sector
Accountability · Business · Commission · Competition (biology · Government (linguistics · Political science · Private sector · Procurement · Public relations · Public sector · Public service · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Accounting · Finance · Marketing
Innovating democracy
Accountability in the Privatised State
Citizen Redress in Public Contracting for Human Services
Equity in Public Services
Accountability in outsourced public service delivery
Government Accountability For Outsourced Services
The transformation of governance paradigms and modalities insights into the marketization of the public service in response to globalization
Surveying Research on Parliament and Parliamentary Oversight of the Public Sector
Investigating Power at the Centre of Government
Citizen Attributions of Blame in Third‐Party Governance
Corporate governance and democratic accountability
Algorithmic discrimination in public service provision
The Effect of Public Service Motivation and Job Level on Bureaucrats’ Preferences for Direct Policy Instruments
Accountability in the Privatized State
Federative patient organizations in a decentralized health-care system
The Reform of Public Management
Informing Wilderness Policy
Collective Action Problems in the Regulation of Australia's Common Property Renewable Resources 1
Bureaucratic Politics and the Demise of the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission
Is expenditure enough? On the nature of the dependent variable in comparative public policy analysis
The Wage Earners' Welfare State Revisited
Having the Bun and the Halfpenny
On religion and public policy
Electoral and partisan influences on Australian fiscal policy from Menzies to Hawke
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,58 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2000 - 2025 (26) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 15 |