Living-apart-together in Britain

Context and meaning

Bibliographic Data

ID12889602
AuthorsJ Haskey (University of Oxford, corresponding author), Jane Lewis (0000-0002-1184-4298, London School of Economics and Political Science)
Year2006
Volume2
Issue01
Pages37-37
Publication date2006-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Law in Context (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-5523 • E-ISSN: 1744-5531
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1744552306001030
OpenAlexW2134714902
LanguageEN
Citations received44

The article draws on two Office of National Statistics’ Omnibus sample surveys to provide the demographic context for living-apart-together.The Omnibus sample surveys for this project were funded by the ONS and by the ESRC (grant no. L326253054). The ESRC grant also supported the qualitative research, and we are grateful to Sophie Sarre and Jennifer Burton, who organised and undertook the interviews. The second part of the paper begins to explore the meanings of this form of partnership through interviews conducted with a sub-sample of respondents to the second survey, conducted in April 2004. The exploratory study complicates our understanding of the range of partnership statuses, which in turn has implications for policymakers grappling with whether and how to regulate different statuses in different ways. We conclude that living-apart-together is a significant form of partnership in Britain, and that it may take place at different points in the lifecourse. We explore the idea that this form of partnership further signals the spread of ‘selfish individualism’ and a ‘flight from commitment’. We find instead that living-apart-together represents a different kind of shared life to those involved from that they perceive to characterise co-residential relationships

Context (archaeology · Exploratory research · General partnership · Geography · Individualism · Meaning (existential · Political science · Qualitative research · Sample (material · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies · Psychology