Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How does power shape district health management team responsiveness to public feedback in low- and middle-income countries

An interpretive synthesis

Bibliographic Data

ID15126947
AuthorsNancy Kagwanja (0000-0002-4411-4961, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, corresponding author), Sassy Molyneux (0000-0001-9522-416X, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme), Eleanor Whyle (0000-0002-4795-0703, University of Cape Town), Benjamin Tsofa (0000-0003-1000-1771, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme), Lucy Gilson (0000-0002-2775-7703, University of Cape Town)
Year2023
Volume38
Issue4
Pages528-551
Publication date2023-04-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy and Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/heapol/czac105
PMID36472343
OpenAlexW4310772615
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited54

Responsiveness is a core element of World Health Organization’s health system framework, considered important for ensuring inclusive and accountable health systems. System-wide responsiveness requires system-wide action, and district health management teams (DHMTs) play critical governance roles in many health systems. However, there is little evidence on how DHMTs enhance health system responsiveness. We conducted this interpretive literature review to understand how DHMTs receive and respond to public feedback and how power influences these processes. A better understanding of power dynamics could strengthen responsiveness and improve health system performance. Our interpretive synthesis drew on English language articles published between 2000 and 2021. Our search in PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus combined terms related to responsiveness (feedback and accountability) and DHMTs (district health manager) yielding 703 articles. We retained 21 articles after screening. We applied Gaventa’s power cube and Long’s actor interface frameworks to synthesize insights about power. Our analysis identified complex power practices across a range of interfaces involving the public, health system and political actors. Power dynamics were rooted in social and organizational power relationships, personal characteristics (interests, attitudes and previous experiences) and world-views (values and beliefs). DHMTs’ exercise of ‘visible power’ sometimes supported responsiveness; however, they were undermined by the ‘invisible power’ of public sector bureaucracy that shaped generation of responses. Invisible power, manifesting in the subconscious influence of historical marginalization, patriarchal norms and poverty, hindered vulnerable groups from providing feedback. We also identified ‘hidden power’ as influencing what feedback DHMTs received and from whom. Our work highlights the influence of social norms, structures and discrimination on power distribution among actors interacting with, and within, the DHMT. Responsiveness can be strengthened by recognising and building on actors' life-worlds (lived experiences) while paying attention to the broader context in which these life-worlds are embedded

Accountability · Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Economics · Health care · Management · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Public health · Public relations · Social determinants of health · Sociology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology

  • The hidden emotional labour behind ensuring the social value of research

    Open Access•Jacinta Nzinga, Jacquie Narotso Oliwa et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • Power and positionality in the practice of health system responsiveness at sub-national level

    Open Access•Nancy Kagwanja, Sassy Molyneux et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2024

  • Understanding health system responsiveness to public feedback at the sub-national level

    Open Access•Nancy Kagwanja, Lucy Gilson et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  • Power

    Open Access•Steven Lukes•Power•1974

  • Development Sociology

    Norman Long•Development Sociology•2003

  • Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research

    Open Access•A Jaure, Allison Tong et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2012

  • What is health systems responsiveness? Review of existing knowledge and proposed conceptual framework

    Open Access•Tolib Mirzoev, Sumit Kane•BMJ Global Health•2017

  • Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups

    Open Access•Mary Dixon-Woods, Debbie Cavers et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2006

  • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

    Open Access•James Thomas, Angela Harden•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2008

  • Power analysis in health policy and systems research

    Open Access•Stephanie M Topp, Marta Schaaf et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives

    Open Access•J Gaventa, Rosemary Mcgee•Development Policy Review•2013

  • Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania

    Open Access•Stephen Maluka•Global Health Action•2011

  • Accountability and health systems

    Open Access•Derick W Brinkerhoff•Health Policy and Planning•2004

  • Public participation in health planning and priority setting at the district level in Uganda

    Open Access•Lydia Kapiriri•Health Policy and Planning•2003

  • How district health decision-making is shaped within decentralised contexts

    Open Access•Susan Bulthuis, Maryse Kok et al.•Global Public Health•2020

  • We are toothless and hanging, but optimistic”

    Open Access•Mary Nyikuri, Mary M Nyikuri et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2017

  • Challenges to fair decision-making processes in the context of health care services

    Open Access•Elizabeth H Shayo, Ole F Norheim et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2012

  • Can community action improve equity for maternal health and how does it do so? Research findings from Gujarat, India

    Open Access•Asha George, Diwakar Mohan et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2018

  • How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya

    Open Access•Benjamin Tsofa, Sassy Molyneux et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2017

  • Local health governance in Tajikistan

    Open Access•Eelco Jacobs, Claudia Baez Camargo•International Journal for Equity…•2020

  • An innovative leadership development initiative to support building everyday resilience in health systems

    Open Access•Jacinta Nzinga, Mwanamvua Boga et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2021

  • Health provider responsiveness to social accountability initiatives in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Elsbet Lodenstein, Marjolein Dieleman et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • Community accountability at peripheral health facilities

    Open Access•Sassy Molyneux, Martin Atela et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries

    Open Access•Lucy Gilson, Nika Raphaely•Health Policy and Planning•2008

  • Practice and power

    Open Access•Lucy Gilson, Hp Schneider et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2014

  • The crowded space of local accountability for maternal, newborn and child health

    Open Access•Fidele Kanyimbu Mukinda, Van Belle et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2020

  • Qualitative research synthesis for health policy analysis

    Open Access•Lucy Gilson•Health Policy and Planning•2014

  • How to start thinking about investigating power in the organizational settings of policy implementation

    Open Access•E Erasmus, Lucy Gilson•Health Policy and Planning•2008

  • Power and pro-poor policies

    Open Access•Sarah L Dalglish, Pamela J Surkan et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2015

  • Holding health providers in developing countries accountable to consumers

    Open Access•David Berlan, Joseph Shiffman•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • The use of street-level bureaucracy theory in health policy analysis in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•E Erasmus•Health Policy and Planning•2014

  • Unpacking the implementation blackbox using 'actor interface analysis

    Open Access•Rakesh Parashar, Nilesh Gawde et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2020

  • Can frameworks inform knowledge about health policy processes? Reviewing health policy papers on agenda setting and testing them against a specific priority-setting framework

    Open Access•G Walt, Lucy Gilson•Health Policy and Planning•2014

  • Enabling relational leadership in primary healthcare settings

    Open Access•Susan Cleary, Alison du Toit et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2018

  • Who is in and who is out? A qualitative analysis of stakeholder participation in priority setting for health in three districts in Uganda

    Open Access•S Donya Razavi, Donya Razavi et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2019

  • Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China

    Open Access•Linda Chelan Li, Lily L Tsai•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania

    Open Access•Stephen Maluka, Peter Kamuzora et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae