Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15297514 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Angela M Stover (0000-0003-0983-686X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), Lotte Haverman (0000-0001-7849-0562, Emma Kinderziekenhuis), Hedy A van Oers (0000-0001-7342-4953, Emma Kinderziekenhuis), Joanne Greenhalgh (0000-0003-2189-8879, University of Leeds), Caroline M Potter (0000-0001-7128-968X, University of Oxford), Sara Ahmed (0000-0001-5172-6790), Elizabeth Gibbons (0000-0001-7593-2361), Kimberly Manalili (0000-0003-0826-7298), Caroline Potter (0000-0003-3105-4987), Natasha Roberts (0000-0003-0534-8084), Maria Santana (0000-0002-0202-5952), Hedy van Oers (Emma Kinderziekenhuis) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 3015-3033 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quality of Life Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0962-9343 • E-ISSN: 1573-2649 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9 |
| PMID | 32651805 |
| OpenAlex | W3040915683 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 62 |
Multilevel IS frameworks are necessary for PROM/PREM implementation given the complexity. In cross-study comparisons, barriers to PROM/PREM implementation were consistent across patient populations and care settings, but enablers were context specific, suggesting the need for tailored implementation strategies based on clinic resources. Theoretically guided studies are needed to clarify how, why, and in what circumstances IS principles lead to successful PROM/PREM integration and sustainability
Business · Context (archaeology · Implementation research · Management science · Operations management · Patient-reported outcome · Process management · Prom · Psychological intervention · Quality of life (healthcare · Workflow · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing
Measuring experiences and outcomes of mental distress-related presentations to Australian emergency departments
Patient perspectives of jail based Moud treatment
Implementation of a patient‐reported experience measure in a Dutch disability care organization
Implementation Strategies for Quality Improvement in Palliative Care
Development of the First Patient‐Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for Hearing Loss in Audiology Care—My Hearing PREM
Reference values for the PROMIS® physical function item bank version 2.0 in the general population
Pharmacist-facilitated Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) monitoring
The utility of the implementation science framework “Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” (i-Parihs) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department
How to make PROMs work
Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Gender-Affirming Surgery
Implementing PROMs where care is complex
Using implementation science to inform the integration of electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) into healthcare quality improvement
Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system
Quality of life during electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring in thoracic surgery patients
Translation and linguistic validation of 24 PROMIS item banks into French
Customizing workflows for electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring using the action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT) framework
Registered Reports
Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures
Moving beyond barriers
Implementation beyond the clinic
Measuring Patient Well-Being During Whole-Person Clinical Care
Assessing Whole-Person Outcomes During Routine Clinical Care
Patient Experiences Completing Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Behavioral Health Within a Health Safety-Net Setting
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Lost in knowledge translation
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement
The FRAME
Implementation Mapping
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
A refined compilation of implementation strategies
Bridging Research and Practice
Rameses II reporting standards for realist evaluations
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice
Using implementation science to inform the integration of electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) into healthcare quality improvement
Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network
A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice
The utility of the implementation science framework “Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” (i-Parihs) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department
The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials
The cost of implementing new strategies (Coins)
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions
Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices
| Unique citing works | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |