Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia

A Formative Study

Bibliographic Data

ID15513741
AuthorsKristy K Law (0000-0002-0542-0114, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author), Kathy Trieu (0000-0003-1848-2741, UNSW Sydney), Jennifer Madz (Diabetes Australia), Daisy H Coyle (0000-0001-8904-0671, UNSW Sydney), Daisy Coyle (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia), Kimberly Glover (0000-0003-3019-1912, UNSW Sydney), Maoyi Tian (0000-0002-5660-8571, Harbin Medical University), Yuze Xin (0009-0003-6955-6154, Harbin Medical University), David Simmons (0000-0003-0560-0761, Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals), Jencia Wong (0000-0003-0321-9553, The University of Sydney), Jason H Wu (0000-0003-2073-3562, UNSW Sydney)
Year2024
Volume21
Issue10
Pages1330-1330
Publication date2024-10-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph21101330
PMID39457303
OpenAlexW4403218163
LanguageEN
References cited49

Produce prescription programs can benefit both individuals and health systems; however, best practices for integrating such programs into the Australian health system are yet unknown. This study explored stakeholders' perspectives on the acceptability, potential design and integration of produce prescription programs for adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 22 participants for an online workshop, representing six stakeholder groups (government, healthcare service, clinician, food retailer, consumer, non-government organisation). Participant responses were gathered through workshop discussions and a virtual collaboration tool (Mural). The workshop was video-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive-inductive approach. Stakeholders recognised produce prescription as an acceptable intervention; however, they identified challenges to implementation related to contextuality, accessibility, and sustainability. Stakeholders were vocal about the approach (e.g., community-led) and infrastructure (e.g., screening tools) needed to support program design and implementation but expressed diverse views about potential funding models, indicating a need for further investigation. Aligning evaluation outcomes with existing measures in local, State and Federal initiatives was recommended, and entry points for integration were identified within and outside of the Australian health sector. Our findings provide clear considerations for future produce prescription interventions for people with type 2 diabetes

Business · Environmental health · Formative assessment · Government (linguistics · Health care · Knowledge management · Medical education · Medical prescription · Nonprobability sampling · Political science · Population · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Thematic analysis · Computer Science · Diabetes Management and Education · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Obesity and Health Practices · Psychology

  • The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  • Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare

    Open Access•Alicia O’cathain, Elizabeth Croot et al.•BMJ Open•2019

  • What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?

    Open Access•Rim Razzouk, Valerie J Shute et al.•Review of Educational Research•2012

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Kathryn Skivington, Lynsay Matthews et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)

    A Jaure, A Tong et al.•International Journal for Quality…•2007

  • Virtual Synchronous Qualitative Data Collection Methods Used in Health and Social Sciences

    Open Access•Marc-Olivier Dubé, Rabia Sabah Meziane et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Murradambirra Dhangaang (make food secure)

    Open Access•Simone Sherriff, Deanna Kalucy et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • In-Person Versus Online Focus Group Discussions

    Open Access•Cory R Woodyatt, Cory Woodyatt et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  • Conducting Research Using Online Workshops During Covid-19

    Open Access•Azwa Shamsuddin, Aziz Sheikh et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection

    Open Access•Mandy Archibald, Rachel C Ambagtsheer et al.•International Journal of…•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae