How Should Global Health Security Priorities Be Set in the Global North and West
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15744889 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Abraar Karan (Brigham and Women's Hospital, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | E50-54 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.50 |
| PMID | 31958391 |
| OpenAlex | W2998222176 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
Epidemics threaten all countries, yet epidemic responses are not implemented in all countries. One reason why is that transnational disease containment efforts (to keep diseases from spreading across borders) differ in important ways from efforts to protect those in countries where an epidemic is active. This article explores these 2 approaches to global health security and suggests reasons to reconsider prioritizing the former first
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Global health · Health care · Health security · Public health · Set (abstract data type · Computer Science · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Global Security and Public Health · Medicine · Nursing · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |