Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Analysis of Studies Testing Digital Interventions to Inoculate Against Misinformation

A Systematic Review

Bibliographic Data

ID17537019
AuthorsDaniel Loughnan (0009-0009-8963-0749, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Aart Van Stekelenburg (0000-0002-9978-0224, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands), J Loes Pouwels (0000-0002-9586-392X, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands), Marieke L Fransen (0000-0003-3399-5932, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands), Mariska Kleemans (0000-0003-0634-1298, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Year2026
Publication date2026-03-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunication Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-6502 • E-ISSN: 1552-3810
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00936502251411467
OpenAlexW7144299121
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited89

The proliferation of misinformation has stimulated research into games and videos to reduce susceptibility to misinformation via psychological inoculation. This research field applies several recent extensions of inoculation theory in novel ways, posing the question of whether such interventions are indeed producing inoculation effects. We conducted a systematic review ( k = 72) to establish the strength of the links between inoculation theory and the outcomes of the tests. We found that the studies did not pose hypotheses relating to the core factors of inoculation theory: threat conferral and counterarguing. Moreover, empirical designs and analyses have introduced confounding factors. Therefore, links between psychological inoculation theory and the tests are weak, and the question of whether the interventions inoculate remains unbroached. We recommend that future research include theoretically relevant variables in improved empirical tests and that researchers exercise caution in interpreting the results of existing studies as representative of psychological inoculation effects

Confounding · Core (optical fiber) · Empirical research · Intervention (counseling) · Misinformation · Nudge theory · Psychological intervention · Psychological Theory · Media Influence and Health · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics

  • Young people evaluating online information credibility. Special issue synthesis

    Open Access•Nicolae Nistor, Yonty Friesem et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2026

  • The Yes-No Experiment

    Michael J Hautus, Neil A Macmillan et al.•Detection Theory•2021

  • Debunking

    Open Access•Man-Pui Sally Chan, Christopher R Jones et al.•Psychological Science•2017

  • Inoculation theory in the post‐truth era

    Open Access•Josh Compton, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2021

  • Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation

    Rakoen Maertens, Jon Roozenbeek et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2021

  • Misinformation

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden•Nature Medicine•2022

  • Addressing the theory crisis in psychology

    Open Access•Klaus Oberauer, Lewandowsky•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2019

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News

    Open Access•Cédric Batailler, Skylar M Brannon et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2022

  • Bad News in the civics classroom

    Open Access•Carl-Anton Werner Axelsson, Thomas Nygren et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2025

  • Inoculation theory

    Josh Compton•Review of Communication•2025

  • Re-examining the bad news game

    Open Access•Tina Seabrooke, Ariana Modirrousta-Galian et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2026

  • Is the Covid-19 Fake News game good news? Testing whether creating and disseminating fake news about vaccines in a computer game reduces people's belief in anti-vaccine arguments

    Open Access•Anna Magdalena Rędzio, Kamil Izydorczak et al.•Acta Psychologica•2023

  • The (Un)Intended Consequences of Emphasizing the Threats of Mis- and Disinformation

    Open Access•Michael Hameleers•Media and Communication•2023

  • Disentangling Item and Testing Effects in Inoculation Research on Online Misinformation

    Open Access•Jon Roozenbeek, Rakoen Maertens et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2021

  • A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  • Some Contemporary Approaches

    William J Mcguire•Advances in Experimental Social…•1964

  • Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation

    Open Access•Jon Roozenbeek, Sander Van Der Linden•Palgrave Communications•2019

  • Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking

    Lewandowsky, Sander Van Der Linden•European Review of Social…•2021

  • Inoculation Theory of Resistance to Influence at Maturity

    Josh Compton, Michael Pfau•Annals of the International…•2005

  • Limits to inoculating against the risk of fake news

    Open Access•Catherine Mei Ling Wong, Yuanyuan Wu•Journal of Risk Research•2023

  • Winning the game against fake news? Using games to inoculate adolescents and young adults in Singapore against fake news

    Open Access•Edson C Tandoc, Seth Seet•Estudios sobre el Mensaje…•2023

  • Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Inoculation Treatments for Resistance to Influence

    Open Access•Josh Compton•Communication Theory•2019

  • A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory

    John A Banas, A Rain•Communication Monographs•2010

  • Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation

    Kimberly A Parker, A Rain et al.•Communication Monographs•2015

  • Apprehension or motivation to defend attitudes? Exploring the underlying threat mechanism in inoculation-induced resistance to persuasion

    John A Banas, Adam S Richards•Communication Monographs•2017

  • The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1973

  • Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology

    Charles M Judd, Jacob Westfall et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2012

  • Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research

    Open Access•Godfred O Boateng, Torsten B Neilands et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2018

  • Towards psychological herd immunity

    Open Access•Melisa Basol, Jon Roozenbeek et al.•Big Data & Society•2021

  • The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion

    William J Mcguire, Demetrios Papageorgis•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

  • How to think about whether misinformation interventions work

    Open Access•Bernard Guay, Adam J Berinsky et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments

    William J Mcguire•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

  • Boosting the Potency of Resistance

    Open Access•Claude H Miller, Bobi Ivanov et al.•Human Communication Research•2013

  • An Empirical Test of a Model of Resistance to Persuasion

    Open Access•Michael Burgoon, Michael D Miller et al.•Human Communication Research•1978

  • The Effects of Initial Belief Level on Inoculation Theory and Its Proposed Mechanisms

    Open Access•Bert Pryor, Thomas M Steinfatt•Human Communication Research•1978

  • Inducing Resistance to Conspiracy Theory Propaganda

    Open Access•John A Banas, Gregory Miller et al.•Human Communication Research•2013

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae