Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prevalence and Demographic Correlates of Rough Sex Behaviors Among Adolescents Ages 14 to 17

Findings From a U.S. Nationally Representative Survey

Bibliographic Data

ID19225762
AuthorsDebby Herbenick (0000-0002-0352-2248, Indiana University Health, corresponding author), Ivanka Simić Stanojević (0000-0002-8581-354X, Indiana University Health), Tsung-chieh Fu, Tsung Chieh Fu (Indiana University Health), Xiwei Chen (0000-0003-1868-8387, Indiana University Bloomington), Sumayyah Ali (Indiana University Bloomington), Paul J Wright (0000-0003-1571-3700, Indiana University Health), Devon Hensel (Indiana University Health), Zoë D Peterson (0000-0003-2975-1062, Indiana University Bloomington), Jaroslaw Harezlak (0000-0002-3070-7686, Indiana University Bloomington), J Dennis Fortenberry (0000-0001-6612-176X, Indiana University School of Medicine)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSexuality Research and Social Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1553-6610 • E-ISSN: 1868-9884
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s13178-026-01298-6
OpenAlexW7162040586
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited93

Introduction Sexual practices commonly described as “rough sex” (e.g., choking, slapping) have become prevalent among young adults in the U.S. and internationally. Little is known about adolescents’ engagement in such behaviors. Using U.S. population data, we examined the prevalence and demographic correlates of rough sex behaviors among U.S. adolescents ages 14- to 17- years old. Method Data are from a confidential online U.S. nationally representative survey conducted in December 2022 and January 2023. Results Of the 1010 adolescents surveyed, 180 had engaged in partnered sex and were then shown questions about ten rough sex experiences. Nearly one in three (30.1%) sexually experienced 14– to 17-year-olds had done one or more of the ten rough sex practices to a partner in the prior year and 36.6% ever in their lifetime. More than one-quarter (27.6%) of sexually experienced adolescents reported that someone had done one or more of the rough sex practices to them with permission or consent in the prior year and 37.1% in their lifetime. Also, 11.7% reported that someone had done one or more of the rough sex practices to them without permission or consent in the prior year and 17.3% in their lifetime. Conclusions Among adolescents who had ever engaged in partnered sexual activities, both consensual and non-consensual rough sex experiences were prevalent. Some of these sexual practices—such as sexual choking/strangulation and smothering—pose significant risks to young people’s health. Policy Implications Findings may inform sexuality education curricula, clinical guidance, and public health guidance and interventions

Confidentiality · Human sexuality · Permission · Population · Public health · Reproductive health · Sexual behavior · Sexually active · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Sex work and related issues · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

  • Rough Sex

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Emily F Galper•The Journal of Sex Research•2026

  • Parent-Adolescent Sexual Communication and Adolescent Safer Sex Behavior

    Open Access•Laura Widman, Sophia Choukas-Bradley et al.•JAMA Pediatrics•2016

  • Sexual diversity in the United States

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Jessamyn Bowling et al.•PLoS ONE•2017

  • Diverse Sexual Behaviors and Pornography Use

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Tsung‐chieh Fu et al.•The Journal of Sexual Medicine•2020

  • Intimate Justice

    Open Access•Sara I Mcclelland•Social and Personality Psychology…•2010

  • Sexual Behavior in the United States

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Michael Reece et al.•The Journal of Sexual Medicine•2010

  • Are Youth Sexting Rates Still on the Rise? A Meta-analytic Update

    Open Access•Camille Mori, Julianna Park et al.•Journal of Adolescent Health•2022

  • Minimising the Risk

    Open Access•Giselle Natassia Woodley, Kelly Jaunzems•M/C Journal•2024

  • Pornography Consumption and Sexual Choking

    Paul J Wright, Debby Herbenick et al.•Health Communication•2023

  • A National Analysis of State Policies on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning/Queer Inclusive Sex Education

    Open Access•Namrata Garg, Anna Volerman•Journal of School Health•2021

  • “It Was Scary, But Then It Was Kind of Exciting”

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Lucia Guerra-Reyes et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2022

  • Frequency, Method, Intensity, and Health Sequelae of Sexual Choking Among U.S. Undergraduate and Graduate Students

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Tsung‐chieh Fu et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2022

  • ChokeMeDaddy

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Lucia Guerra-Reyes et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2023

  • Prevalence of Sexual Strangulation/Choking Among Australian 18–35 Year-Olds

    Open Access•Leah Sharman, Robin Fitzgerald et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2025

  • Changes in Penile-Vaginal Intercourse Frequency and Sexual Repertoire from 2009 to 2018

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Molly Rosenberg et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2022

  • What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Tsung‐chieh Fu et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Normative Sexuality Development in Adolescence

    Open Access•Deborah L Tolman, Sara I Mcclelland•Journal of Research on Adolescence•2011

  • Relationships and Sex Education teaching in English secondary schools and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Corrina Horan, Judith Stephenson et al.•Sex Education•2025

  • “Without Porn … I Wouldn't Know Half the Things I Know Now”

    E F Rothman, Courtney Kaczmarsky et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2014

  • Prevention is political

    Open Access•Marc T Kiviniemi, H Orom et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Trust, Sexual Trust, and Sexual Health

    J Dennis Fortenberry•The Journal of Sex Research•2019

  • Some Things Just Won’t Go Back”

    Alanna Goldstein, Sarah Flicker•Girlhood Studies•2020

  • Predictors of Parental Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexual Health–Related Research

    Open Access•Kristin L Moilanen•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2015

  • Research in brief

    Open Access•Nicola Döring, M Rohangis Mohseni et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2024

  • I Wanna Hold Your Hand

    Open Access•Lucia F O’sulliban, Mariah Mantsun Cheng et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2007

  • Traces of Pornography

    Open Access•Michael Tholander, Sofia Johansson et al.•Sexuality & Culture•2022

  • The failed promise of consent in women's experiences of coercive and unwanted anal sex with men

    Open Access•Maria João Faustino, N Gavey•Feminism & Psychology•2024

  • Understanding the Link Between Social and Emotional Well-Being and Peer Relations in Early Adolescence

    Open Access•E Oberle, Kimberly A Schonert-Reichl et al.•Journal of Youth and Adolescence•2010

  • Agency Is Everywhere, but Agency Is Not Enough

    Laina Y Bay-Cheng, Laina Bay-Cheng•The Journal of Sex Research•2019

  • Is “Rough Sex” a Thing? A Survey of Meaning

    Open Access•N Gavey, Olivia Brewster•The Journal of Sex Research•2025

  • The Rise of Spanking, Hitting, and Strangulation

    Eran Shor, X Liu•The Journal of Sex Research•2025

  • Behind Closed Doors

    Julia C Tomassilli, Sarit A Golub et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2009

  • Choking on TikTok

    Mary Balle, Dakota Brandenburg et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2025

  • Development of Sexual Expectancies among Adolescents

    Kathryn Ragsdale, Kathleen Ragsdale et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2013

  • Perceived Impact of the Parental Rights in Education Act (“Don’t Say Gay”) on LGBTQ+ Parents in Florida

    Open Access•A E Goldberg, Roberto L Abreu et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•2023

  • Prevalence and Demographic Correlates of “Rough Sex” Behaviors

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Tsung‐chieh Fu et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2025

  • Sexual Compulsivity and Sexual Risk in Gay and Bisexual Men

    Open Access•Christian Grov, Jeffrey T Parsons et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2010

  • Choking/Strangulation During Sex

    Open Access•Isabella Conte, Leah Sharman et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2025

  • Sources of Learning about Sexual Choking and Their Associations with Perceived Safety and Risk

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Tsung‐chieh Fu et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2024

  • Navigating Consent in the Context of Sexual Choking/Strangulation

    Open Access•Debby Herbenick, Lucia Guerra-Reyes et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2024

  • Deconstructing ‘Rough Sex’ in a New Zealand Murder Trial

    Open Access•N Gavey•Social & Legal Studies•2024

  • The Accuracy of Measurements with Probability and Nonprobability Survey Samples

    Open Access•Bo Macinnis, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Sensation Seeking, Peer Influence, and Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescents

    Open Access•R Siraj, B Najam et al.•Education Research International•2021

  • The great decline in adolescent risk behaviours

    Open Access•Jude Ball, Richard Grucza et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae