Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving health sector coordination for resilient healthcare systems

European lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic

Bibliographic Data

ID19534166
AuthorsStefano Guicciardi (0000-0003-3539-2828, Azienda USL di Bologna, corresponding author), Michael A Stoto (0000-0001-8293-471X, Georgetown University), Chiara Reno (0000-0002-7933-2141, University of Bologna), Federico Toth (0000-0002-1596-6460, University of Bologna), Svetla Tsolova (0000-0003-1359-2503, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control), Maria Pia Fantini (0000-0002-3257-6552, University of Bologna)
Year2026
Volume22
Issue1
Publication date2026-05-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12992-026-01216-w
PMID42143380
OpenAlexW4411382456
LanguageEN
References cited24

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of integrating the concepts of Public Health Emergency Preparedness and health system resilience, emphasizing the role of coordination across sectors, which is essential for ensuring that systems can respond effectively to public health threats and manage resources efficiently. This paper aims to summarize the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic among European Union Member States, focusing on gaps and improvement areas within coordination of healthcare services. METHODS: The study analyzes the experience of Croatia, Finland, Germany, Italy, and Spain during the initial phase of the pandemic. These countries were selected for their diverse organizational structures and varying responses to COVID-19. The research involved literature reviews, analyses of pandemic preparedness plans, and interviews with national focal points and experts. Key areas of public health emergency capabilities were examined using the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Logic Model developed in 2017, with a particular focus on coordination of health services. RESULTS: The analysis focused on four capabilities in the health services domain. Among them, coordination of population-based medicine emerged as a key element in integrating public health and primary care during pandemics and to ensure consistent and coherent response within the whole health system. Common challenges included organizational fragmentation and communication barriers, which hindered effective coordination across healthcare services. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed, at national, regional and local levels, several gaps in coordination between hospitals, primary care, and public health services. At the same time, it provided lessons on measures that countries can implement to enhance Public Health Emergency Preparedness and thus resilience of health systems, for future health emergencies. By fostering collaboration between services and addressing systemic barriers, healthcare systems can enhance coordination and deliver high-quality, patient-centered care . More than anything, the pandemic underscored the importance of effective leadership and system adaptability strongly aligned with comprehensive emergency plans that clearly outline in advance tasks, responsibilities and procedures. Furthermore, creating effective communication channels and tools can significantly improve information exchange between healthcare providers and emergency responders, ensuring timely and efficient responses to emerging health threats

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Healthcare system · Pandemic · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Virology

  • Understanding Community Resilience in the Context of National Health Security

    Anita Chandra, Joie Acosta et al.•2010

  • The resilience of the Spanish health system against the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Helena Legido-Quigley, José Tomás Mateos et al.•The Lancet Public Health•2020

  • Pandemic preparedness and Covid-19

    Open Access•Thomas J Bollyky, Erin N Hulland et al.•The Lancet•2022

  • Health systems resilience in managing the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Viscount Haldane, Chuan De Foo et al.•Nature Medicine•2021

  • Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems

    C S Holling•Annual Review of Ecology and…•1973

  • The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

    Open Access•Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Shinichi Egawa et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2015

  • Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries

    Open Access•Saqif Mustafa, Yu Zhang et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2022

  • How the health services of Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy and Veneto handled the Covid-19 emergency

    Federico Toth•Contemporary Italian Politics•2021

  • Towards an understanding of resilience

    Open Access•Johanna Hanefeld, Susannah Mayhew et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2018

  • Conceptualizing and Defining Public Health Emergency Preparedness

    Christopher Nelson, Nicole Lurie et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2007

  • Thinking outside the box, improvisation, and fast learning

    Open Access•Giliberto Capano, Federico Toth•Public Administration•2022

  • Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap

    Martin Landau•Public Administration Review•1969

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae