Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19562709 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pak‐Hang Wong (0000-0001-8720-9912, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Pak-Hang Wong |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 225-244 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2210-5433 • E-ISSN: 2210-5441 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s13347-019-00355-w |
| OpenAlex | W2947160886 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 44 |
| References cited | 48 |
Accountability · Data mining · Economics · Epistemology · Fairness measure · Machine learning · Philosophy of science · Philosophy of technology · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Mathematics · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Artificial Intelligence
Beyond bias and discrimination
Unpacking AI at work
Compliance behavior with Indonesian language in local government administration
The “Trolley Problem” in Fully Automated AI-Driven Media
Algorithmic bias and the Value Sensitive Design approach
Transparency as design publicity
Weapons of moral construction? On the value of fairness in algorithmic decision-making
What Do We Teach to Engineering Students
Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places
Hammer or Measuring Tape? Artificial Intelligence and Justice in Healthcare
Judging in the Dark
Philosophical Inquiry into Computer Intentionality
People-Centered Smart Cities
Against “Democratizing AI”
The ethics of algorithms
Democratizing AI in public administration
Beyond federated data
Conservative AI and social inequality
Moral disagreement and the limits of AI value alignment
Responsible innovation between virtue and governance
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making
Rawlsian Algorithmic Fairness and a Missing Aggregation Property of the Difference Principle
Egalitarianism and Algorithmic Fairness
Abolish! Against the Use of Risk Assessment Algorithms at Sentencing in the US Criminal Justice System
First- and Second-Level Bias in Automated Decision-making
Steering Representations—Towards a Critical Understanding of Digital Twins
Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness
What’s Impossible about Algorithmic Fairness
Distribution, Recognition, and Just Medical AI
“Democratizing AI” and the Concern of Algorithmic Injustice
Ethical Redress of Racial Inequities in AI
Nurturing Virtues with Digital Democratic Innovations
A People’s AI
Technology and Civic Virtue
Promises and Pitfalls of Algorithm Use by State Authorities
When is AI democratic? Artificial intelligence and democratic empowerment
Gaslighting Ourselves
Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making
Predictive policing and algorithmic fairness
Broomean(ish) Algorithmic Fairness
Big Tech, Algorithmic Power, and Democratic Control
The trustification of AI. Disclosing the bridging pillars that tie trust and AI together
Designing Better Access to Education? Unified Enrollment, School Choice, and the Limits of Algorithmic Fairness in New Orleans School Admissions
Power and politics in framing bias in Artificial Intelligence policy
After the revolution
Why Deliberative Democracy?
The responsibility gap
Fairness through awareness
Bias in computer systems
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact
The many faces of equal opportunity
Contractualism and utilitarianism
Inclusion and Democracy
Capabilities, opportunity, and health
Inclusion and Democracy
Handbook of Risk Theory
Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
Public Deliberation and Governance
Four Conceptions of Equal Opportunity
Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research
Equality and Partiality
Limits to Health Care
Procedural justice and democratic institutional design in health-care priority-setting
Critical Questions for Big Data
Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms
Fairer machine learning in the real world
The ethics of algorithms
How the machine 'thinks
Fairness and Philosophy
Between Facts and Norms
People's Councils for Ethical Machine Learning
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments
| Unique citing works | 44 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 44 |