Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

India may need an additional metric to assess the endemicity of malaria in low surveillance districts

Bibliographic Data

ID19592534
AuthorsChander Prakash Yadav (0000-0001-7531-6307, National Institute of Malaria Research), Sanjeev Gupta (0000-0002-9660-6597), Sanjeev Kumar Gupta (0000-0001-7583-2301, National Institute of Malaria Research), Praveen K Bharti (0000-0003-1511-7503, National Institute of Malaria Research), Manju Rahi (0000-0003-0932-0935, Indian Council of Medical Research), Nafis Faizi (0000-0002-4634-6790, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Hospital), Amit Sharma (0000-0001-6130-1913, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, corresponding author)
EditorsLouisa Alexandra Messenger
Year2022
Volume2
Issue11
Pagese0000326
Publication date2022-11-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0000326
PMID36962502
OpenAlexW4308701011
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

India’s National Framework for malaria elimination is essentially dependent on Annual Parasite Incidence (API). API is the primary criterion for classifying states and districts into different categories: intensified control, pre-elimination, elimination, prevention and re-establishment of malaria. However, API’s validity is critically dependent on multiple factors, one such important factor is Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER) and is often considered as indicator of operational efficiency. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine whether the API is a sufficiently good malaria index to assess malaria endemicity in India. An in-depth analysis of malaria data (2017–19) was done to determine the appropriateness of API as a sole indicator of malaria endemicity. We stratified the Indian districts into three strata based on Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER): 15, further APIs was compared with Slide Positivity Rates (SPRs) using sign rank test, independently in each stratum. API and SPR were found comparable (p-value 0.323) in stratum 2 only. However, in the case of lower ABER ( 15%), the API was found substantially higher than the SPR. Thus, ABER tunes the validity of API and should avoid to use as a single indicator of malaria endemicity. API is an appropriate measure of malaria endemicity in high and moderate transmission areas where surveillance is good (ABER≥5%). However, it is vitally dependent upon surveillance rate and other factors such as population size, the selection of individuals for malaria testing. Therefore, where surveillance is poor (

Business · Environmental health · Geography · Malaria · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Malaria Research and Control · Medicine · Mosquito-borne diseases and control · Travel-related health issues · Immunology

  • Assessment of the quality of malaria surveillance and laboratory services for diagnosis in three districts of Gujarat state, India

    Open Access•Jaspreet Kaur, Rajendra Kumar Baharia et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Tracking district-level performance in the context of achieving zero indigenous case status by 2027

    Open Access•Chander Prakash Yadav, Syed Shah Areeb Hussain et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • For malaria elimination India needs a platform for data integration

    Open Access•Manju Rahi, Amit Sharma•BMJ Global Health•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae