Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why innovations in policing don’t work or don’t translate

An implementation science survey of US police leaders

Bibliographic Data

ID21177794
AuthorsBrandon Del Pozo (0000-0001-6481-2196, John Brown University, corresponding author), Rose E A Nevill (0000-0002-4802-7128, University of the Virgin Islands), Rose E Nevill (University of Virgina), José Cepeda (0000-0003-0304-3172, Johns Hopkins University), Javier Cepeda (The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health), Ian T Adams (0000-0001-5595-8070, University of South Carolina), Alina Whiteside (0000-0003-4741-6823, John Brown University), Erin L Thompson (0000-0002-0932-5894, John Brown University), Erin Thompson (0000-0001-6451-2679, Brown University Health)
Year2026
Volume27
Issue1
Pages110-130
Publication date2026-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolice Practice and Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1561-4263 • E-ISSN: 1477-271X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15614263.2025.2512806
PMID40979841
OpenAlexW4411040634
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited41

This study examined organizational and community-level barriers and facilitators that influence innovation in policing using an implementation science framework. A body of 31 survey items operationalized for implementation in police settings were mapped onto the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The resulting instrument was administered to 72 police leaders and researchers. Respondents agreed implementation bore heavily on an innovation's prospects for success independent of its effectiveness. There was agreement that innovations in policing were often more complex than the actions they replaced, not integrated into officers' performance evaluations, and were likely to be mistrusted if they originated from external sources. Officers were unlikely to understand an innovation's comparative value, and likely to seek their own preferred outcomes regardless. Responses illustrate how effective policing practices could nonetheless be deemed infeasible, providing insights into why many of the innovations that seek to improve policing are met with limited success

Engineering ethics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Psychology · Mechanical Engineering

  • Police experiences with cannabis legalization and perceptions of broader drug policy reform

    Open Access•Bradley E Silberzahn, Kristin E Schneider et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2026

  • Reducing Officers’ Resistance to Evidence-Based Policing

    Open Access•Kiseong Kuen•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2025

  • The politics of police technology adoption

    Open Access•Ángel Mendiola Ross, Alison E Post et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2025

  • The Portuguese police experience with drug decriminalisation

    Open Access•Miguel Moniz, Beatriz Ribeiro et al.•Policing & Society•2026

  • The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  • Welcome to Implementation Science

    Open Access•Martin Eccles, Martin P Eccles et al.•Implementation Science•2006

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Evidence based medicine

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Jeremy Howick et al.•BMJ•2014

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy

    Michael Lipsky•Michigan Law Review•1981

  • The answer is 17 years, what is the question

    Open Access•Zoë Slote Morris, Steven Wooding et al.•Proceedings of the Royal Society…•2011

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement

    Open Access•Erik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.•The Lancet•2007

  • Linkage facilitation for opioid use disorder in criminal legal system contexts

    Open Access•Milan F Satcher, Steven Belenko et al.•Health & Justice•2024

  • Guiding officers to deflect citizens to treatment

    Open Access•Jessica Reichert, Sharyn Adams et al.•Health & Justice•2023

  • Unlocking deflection

    Open Access•Phillip L Marotta, Brandon Del Pozo et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2023

  • Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior

    Open Access•Robin S Engel, Nicholas Corsaro et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2022

  • Speaking of reform

    Open Access•Scott M Mourtgo, Ian T Adams et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2024

  • The rhetoric of de-policing

    Open Access•Scott M Mourtgo, Scott M Mourtgos et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2019

  • Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research

    Open Access•Paul A Sabatier, Paul Sabatier•Journal of Public Policy•1986

  • Resisting Evidence

    Open Access•Catherine Pope•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2003

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae