Transitivity prominence within and across modalities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21239733 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carl Börstell (0000-0001-7549-4648, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Tommi Jantunen (0000-0001-9736-5425, University of Jyväskylä), Vadim Kimmelman (0000-0002-8748-6845, University of Bergen), Vanja De Lint (University of Amsterdam), Johanna Mesch (0000-0002-0612-6304, Stockholm University), Marloes Oomen (0000-0002-3420-6432, University of Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 666-689 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Open Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2300-9969 • E-ISSN: 2300-9969 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/opli-2019-0037 |
| OpenAlex | W2796932318 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
We investigate transitivity prominence of verbs across signed and spoken languages, based on data from both valency dictionaries and corpora. Our methodology relies on the assumption that dictionary data and corpus-based measures of transitivity are comparable, and we find evidence in support of this through the direct comparison of these two types of data across several spoken languages. For the signed modality, we measure the transitivity prominence of verbs in five sign languages based on corpus data and compare the results to the transitivity prominence hierarchy for spoken languages reported in Haspelmath (2015). For each sign language, we create a hierarchy for 12 verb meanings based on the proportion of overt direct objects per verb meaning. We use these hierarchies to calculate correlations between languages – both signed and spoken – and find positive correlations between transitivity hierarchies. Additional findings of this study include the observation that locative arguments seem to behave differently than direct objects judging by our measures of transitivity, and that relatedness among sign languages does not straightforwardly imply similarity in transitivity hierarchies. We conclude that our findings provide support for a modality-independent, semantic basis of transitivity
Combinatorics · Epistemology · Geography · Linguistics · Phenomenon · Transitive relation · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Mathematics · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Ggplot2
Prototypical Transitivity
The Palm-Up Puzzle
Argument Structure of Classifier Predicates
Transitivity Typology
Locative-Related Roles and the Argument-Adjunct Distinction in Balinese
Arguments and Adjuncts Cross-Linguistically
Arguments and Adjuncts as Language-Particular Syntactic Categories and as Comparative Concepts
Where did all the arguments go
Grammaticalization and modality
Body as subject
Remarks on transitivity
NGT classifier constructions
A typological perspective on Differential Object Marking
Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |