Exit, voice or neglect
Understanding the choices faced by doctors experiencing barriers to leading health system change through the case of Sierra Leone
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21257892 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Oliver Johnson (0000-0003-4219-4782, King's College London, corresponding author), Foday Sahr (0000-0001-9816-4502, University of Sierra Leone), Nick Sevdalis (0000-0001-7560-8924, King's College London), Ann H Kelly (0000-0003-4658-2133, King's College London) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Pages | 100123 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SSM - Qualitative Research in Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2667-3215 • E-ISSN: 2667-3215 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100123 |
| PMID | 36531296 |
| OpenAlex | W4285040336 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 26 |
This paper presents a study from Sierra Leone that explored the experiences of doctors as they endeavored to improve the health care systems in which they worked. Twenty-eight interviews were conducted with doctors in Sierra Leone, complemented by long-standing experience of national health provision and research by the authors. Drawing on Hirschman's theory of ‘exit, voice and loyalty’, the paper's framework analysis elaborates the doctor's career decisions and choices under systematic political and economic constraints, and in particular, the specter of retribution, including posting to undesirable jobs and withholding of salaries. This retribution was considered a driver of exit by doctors from the system, and few examples were given of doctors successfully advocating for change through advocacy (‘voice’). We suggest that the relevance of Hirschman's theory to this setting is in drawing attention to the critical themes of retribution, opportunity, loyalties, and partial exits, ones often neglected in efforts to reduce emigration of doctors and strengthen their leadership. Ultimately, this paper critiques the overemphasis of mechanistic ‘capacity building’ in global health and recommends that health system strengthening must be viewed as a jointly political as well as technical exercise
Economic Justice · Health care · Neglect · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Retributive justice · Sierra leone · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Global Health and Surgery · Global Health Workforce Issues · Global Maternal and Child Health · Law · Medicine · Nursing
Leadership Without Easy Answers
Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries
WHO Health Promotion Glossary
Motivations of South African physicians specialising in public health
Getting to zero
Educating leaders in hospital management
To bend without breaking
Interventions to strengthen the leadership capabilities of health professionals in Sub-Saharan Africa
Achievements and challenges in developing health leadership in South Africa
Strengthening health system leadership for better governance
Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect
Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Pay
Sampling Knowledge
Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness
We are the heroes because we are ready to die for this country
How Many Interviews Are Enough
The Binds of Global Health Partnership
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |