Identifying the Facilitators and Barriers in Disseminating and Adopting a Health Intervention Developed by a Community–Academic Partnership
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21650645 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Truely Harding (0000-0002-3391-3928, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, corresponding author), John Oetzel (0000-0003-3188-776X, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand), Mary Simpson (University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand), Mary Louisa Simpson (0000-0002-3915-4897, University of Waikato), Sophie Nock (0000-0002-6588-1158, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 724-731 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Education & Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1090-1981 • E-ISSN: 1552-6127 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10901981211033228 |
| PMID | 34697952 |
| OpenAlex | W3209137962 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
The literature regarding implementation science of evidence-based health interventions in Māori communities is limited, and there is a push for new and innovative delivery methods of health interventions in New Zealand. The purpose of the study was to identify the facilitators and barriers in implementing a health intervention designed by others and was framed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). This study explored general perceptions of the implementation process and also included a case study, the Kaumātua Mana Motuhake (older people’s autonomy and self-actualization) project; a codesigned peer education intervention for older Māori. Semistructured interviews ( N = 17) were conducted via face-to-face, phone, or Zoom with health and social service professionals with experience working with Māori communities. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. The facilitators included community engagement, program structure, program adaptability and creators’ experience. The barriers consisted of funding access, funding constraints and organizational constraints. The findings support key elements within the CFIR, highlighting the importance of community engagement and adaptability. Additionally, this study identified nuanced aspects of funding and resources that constrain organisations in employing health interventions designed by others
General partnership · Health promotion · Implementation research · Medical education · Peer support · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Collecting data using a semi‐structured interview
Skype interviewing
Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice
Title unavailable
Implementation framework for chronic disease intervention effectiveness in Māori and other indigenous communities
Kaumātua mana motuhake in action
Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice
The impact of racism on the future health of adults
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |