Twitter and political discourses
How supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling Zanu PF party use Twitter for political engagement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2182662 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bhekizulu Bethaphi Tshuma (0000-0002-5791-9590, University of the Free State, corresponding author), Lungile A Tshuma (0000-0001-6654-0841, University of Johannesburg), Mphathisi Ndlovu (0000-0002-9191-2106, Stellenbosch University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 269-288 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Eastern African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1753-1055 • E-ISSN: 1753-1063 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17531055.2022.2076385 |
| OpenAlex | W4281397519 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 29 |
Social networks such as Twitter are transforming political engagements in contemporary societies. Dominant literature places emphasis on the counter-hegemonic opportunities offered by social media in the Zimbabwean political landscape. However, there is a need to draw scholarly attention to how supporters of the ruling party, Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU PF), are appropriating and using Twitter for political engagements. Drawing upon the case of Varakashi (ZANU PF's social media trolls and supporters), this paper examines how supporters of the ruling party in the post-Robert Mugabe era are increasingly occupying online spaces that were traditionally associated with opposition voices. President Emmerson Mnangagwa's regime has been grappling with legitimacy issues in the wake of the November 2017 coup that toppled Mugabe, the contested July 2018 election, and the shooting of civilians in August 2018. Focusing on four Twitter handles of Varakashi, this article employs rhetorical argumentation to analyse how these Twitter propagandists are defending and promoting the interests of the Mnangagwa regime. Findings demonstrate that the Varakashi are sanitising and justifying the November 2017 coup, campaigning for Mnangagwa in the July 2018 election, and in justifying the killing of civilians in August 2018
Hegemony · Legitimacy · Media studies · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social media · Sociology · African studies and sociopolitical issues · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
Varakashi, Ideological Hegemony and Cyber Propaganda in the Post Mugabe Era
Platform Activism and the Mediation of Electoral Process in Semi-Authoritarian Regimes
Zanu-PF and Emmerson Mnangagwa’s Rebranding Strategies on Twitter (X) in the 2018 Elections in Zimbabwe
The Potential Role of Social Media in Peacebuilding in Zimbabwe
Everyday authoritarianism in Zimbabwe
Audience perceptions of AI-driven news presenters
Country and countryhood
Politics at Play
Constitutional law and internet regulation in Africa
Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Social Media and Elections in Zimbabwe
When the subaltern speaks
“Fake News” and Cyber-Propaganda in Sub-Saharan Africa
ThisFlag and #ThisGown Cyber Protests in Zimbabwe
Digital Media, Fake News and Pro-Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Alliance Cyber-Propaganda during the 2018 Zimbabwe Election
Succession Politics and Factional Journalism in Zimbabwe
African Music, Power, and Being in Colonial Zimbabwe
Analysing Newspapers
A complicated but symbiotic affair
Social Media in Turkey as a Space for Political Battles
Social Media and Postelection Crisis in Kenya
Mobile Phones, Popular Media, and Everyday African Democracy
Mugabeism? History, Politics, and Power in Zimbabwe
Citizen Journalism and the Parallel Market of Information in Zimbabwe's 2008 Election
New media and journalism practice in Africa
Blogging down a dictatorship
Of weevils and gamatox
Reinvoking the past in the present
Patriotic History and Public Intellectuals Critical of Power
Speaking for the dead
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |