Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Enhanced or hindered research benefits? A realist review of community engagement and participatory research practices for non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21879007
AutoresSonja Klingberg (0000-0002-9330-7102, South African Medical Research Council, autor correspondente), Bipin Adhikari (0000-0001-8981-3910, Mahidol University), Catherine E Draper (0000-0002-2885-437X, South African Medical Research Council), E N Bosire (0000-0002-4781-7101, South African Medical Research Council), Edna Bosire (SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa), Deborah Nyirenda (0000-0002-5867-4687, University of Liverpool), Priscilla Tiigah (Independent researcher, London, UK), Ferdinand C Mukumbang (0000-0003-1441-2172, University of Washington)
Ano2024
Volume9
Fascículo2
Páginase013712
Data de publicação2024-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
EditoraBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013712
PMID38341191
OpenAlexW4391717783
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas57

INTRODUCTION: Community engagement and participatory research are widely used and considered important for ethical health research and interventions. Based on calls to unpack their complexity and observed biases in their favour, we conducted a realist review with a focus on non-communicable disease prevention. The aim was to generate an understanding of how and why engagement or participatory practices enhance or hinder the benefits of non-communicable disease research and interventions in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We retroductively formulated theories based on existing literature and realist interviews. After initial searches, preliminary theories and a search strategy were developed. We searched three databases and screened records with a focus on theoretical and empirical relevance. Insights about contexts, strategies, mechanisms and outcomes were extracted and synthesised into six theories. Five realist interviews were conducted to complement literature-based theorising. The final synthesis included 17 quality-appraised articles describing 15 studies. RESULTS: We developed six theories explaining how community engagement or participatory research practices either enhance or hinder the benefits of non-communicable disease research or interventions. Benefit-enhancing mechanisms include community members' agency being realised, a shared understanding of the benefits of health promotion, communities feeling empowered, and community members feeling solidarity and unity. Benefit-hindering mechanisms include community members' agency remaining unrealised and participation being driven by financial motives or reputational expectations. CONCLUSION: Our review challenges assumptions about community engagement and participatory research being solely beneficial in the context of non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries. We present both helpful and harmful pathways through which health and research outcomes are affected. Our practical recommendations relate to maximising benefits and minimising harm by addressing institutional inflexibility and researcher capabilities, managing expectations on research, promoting solidarity in solving public health challenges and sharing decision-making power

Citizen journalism · Community engagement · Community-based participatory research · Focus group · Non-communicable disease · Participatory action research · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Ethics in Clinical Research · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing

  • The Ugandan youth public health ambassador program

    Open Access•Heather Wipfli, Abigail Kim et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Balancing realist review outputs with the needs of policymakers and practitioners

    Open Access•Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Sonja Klingberg et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2025

  • Mechanism-Based Middle-Range Theories

    Open Access•Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Geoff Wong•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • Conceptualizing Community Engagement for Mental and Brain Health Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

    Open Access•Edna N Bosire, Linda Khakali et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • Rameses publication standards

    Open Access•Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•BMC Medicine•2013

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  • Realist Synthesis for Public Health

    Justin Jagosh•Annual Review of Public Health•2019

  • Implementation strategies

    Open Access•Enola K Proctor, Byron J Powell et al.•Implementation Science•2013

  • Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research

    Open Access•Justin Jagosh, Ann C Macaulay et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2012

  • Achieving successful community engagement

    Open Access•Esther De Weger, Natascha Van Vooren et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2018

  • How we classify countries and people—and why it matters

    Open Access•Themrise Khan, Seye Abimbola et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • A critical examination of research narratives ‘rumours’ and passive community resistance in medical research

    Open Access•Deborah Nyirenda, Sakari Sariola et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Unravelling ‘low-resource settings’

    Open Access•Chanel van Zyl, Marelise Badenhorst et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • The use, misuse and overuse of the ‘low-income and middle-income countries’ category

    Open Access•Raphael Lencucha, Sujaya Neupane•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • ‘You want to deal with power while riding on power’

    Open Access•Beatrice Egid, Maria Roura et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • “Must you make an app?” A qualitative exploration of socio-technical challenges and opportunities for designing digital maternal and child health solutions in Soweto, South Africa

    Open Access•Sonja Klingberg, Molebogeng Motlhatlhedi et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2022

  • Healthy eating and physical activity

    Open Access•Gudani Mukoma, E N Bosire et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • Culture and epidemiology of diabetes in South Asia

    Open Access•Bipin Adhikari, Shiva Raj Mishra•Journal of Global Health•2019

  • Identifying opportunities to engage communities with social mobilisation activities to tackle NCDs in El Salvador in the context of the global Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Lizzie Caperon, Stella Arakelyan et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2021

  • Cultural adaptation of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program for diabetes prevention in India

    Open Access•Elezebeth Mathews, Emma Thomas et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • Effects of a community-based healthy heart program on increasing healthy women's physical activity

    Open Access•Raha Pazoki, Iraj Nabipour et al.•BMC Public Health•2007

  • Searching for new community engagement approaches in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Esther De Weger, N J E Van Vooren et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research

    Open Access•Justin Jagosh, Paula Louise Bush et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Understanding communication in community engagement for maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Sara Dada, Praveenkumar Aivalli et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2023

  • Visual Participatory Analysis

    Open Access•Jenevieve Mannell, Katy Davis et al.•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2020

  • Understanding ‘context’ in realist evaluation and synthesis

    Open Access•Joanne Greenhalgh, Ana Manzano•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation

    Open Access•Ana Manzano•Evaluation•2022

  • A New Realistic Evaluation Analysis Method

    Open Access•Suzanne F Jackson, Gillian Kolla•American Journal of Evaluation•2012

  • Retroductive Theorizing

    Open Access•Ferdinand C Mukumbang•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2021

  • Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley's applied scientific realism

    Justin Jagosh•Journal of Critical Realism•2020

  • Comparing abduction and retroduction in Peircean pragmatism and critical realism

    Bridget Ritz•Journal of Critical Realism•2020

  • Community researchers conducting health disparities research

    Open Access•Maghboeba Mosavel, Rashid Ahmed et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa

    Open Access•Maghboeba Mosavel, Christian Simon et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Examining the Application of Retroductive Theorizing in Realist-Informed Studies

    Open Access•Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Eveline Muika Kabongo et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • What's in a Realist Configuration? Deciding Which Causal Configurations to Use, How, and Why

    Open Access•Esther De Weger, N J E Van Vooren et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Using the realist interview approach to maintain theoretical awareness in realist studies

    Open Access•Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Bruno Marchal et al.•Qualitative Research•2020

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano4
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae