Defining and identifying the critical elements of operational readiness for public health emergency events

A rapid scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID21879492
AuthorsRené English (0000-0002-1563-2532, Western Cape Department of Health), Heather Carlson (World Health Organization), Heike Geduld (0000-0001-6512-1274, Stellenbosch University), Juliet Charity Yauka Nyasulu (0000-0003-1158-6302, Western Cape Department of Health), Quinette Louw (0000-0003-0238-0943, Western Cape Department of Health), Karina Berner (0000-0002-2255-371X, Western Cape Department of Health), Maria Yvonne Charumbira (0000-0002-2441-2566, Western Cape Department of Health), Michele Pappin (Western Cape Department of Health), Michael McCaul (0000-0002-2730-6478, Western Cape Department of Health), Conran Joseph (0000-0002-3121-2685, Western Cape Department of Health), Nina H Gobat (0000-0002-1558-557X, World Health Organization), Nina Gobat (World Health Organization), Linda Lucy Boulanger (World Health Organization), Nedret Emiroglu (World Health Organization)
Year2024
Volume9
Issue8
Pagese014379
Publication date2024-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014379
PMID39209763
OpenAlexW4402073918
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited60

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 showed that countries must strengthen their operational readiness (OPR) capabilities to respond to an imminent pandemic threat rapidly and proactively. We conducted a rapid scoping evidence review to understand the definition and critical elements of OPR against five core sub-systems of a new framework to strengthen the global architecture for Health Emergency Preparedness Response and Resilience (HEPR). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, targeted repositories, websites, and grey literature databases for publications between 1 January 2010 and 29 September 2021 in English, German, French or Afrikaans. Included sources were of any study design, reporting OPR, defined as immediate actions taken in the presence of an imminent threat, from groups who led or responded to a specified health emergency. We used prespecified and tested methods to screen and select sources, extract data, assess credibility and analyse results against the HEPR framework. RESULTS: Of 7005 sources reviewed, 79 met the eligibility criteria, including 54 peer-reviewed publications. The majority were descriptive reports (28%) and qualitative analyses (30%) from early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Definitions of OPR varied while nine articles explicitly used the term 'readiness', others classified OPR as part of preparedness or response. Applying our working OPR definition across all sources, we identified OPR actions within all five HEPR subsystems. These included resource prepositioning for early detection, data sharing, tailored communication and interventions, augmented staffing, timely supply procurement, availability and strategic dissemination of medical countermeasures, leadership, comprehensive risk assessment and resource allocation supported by relevant legislation. We identified gaps related to OPR for research and technology-enabled manufacturing platforms. CONCLUSIONS: OPR is in an early stage of adoption. Establishing a consistent and explicit framework for OPRs within the context of existing global legal and policy frameworks can foster coherence and guide evidence-based policy and practice improvements in health emergency management

Medical emergency · Public health · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research