Decision-making under epistemic, strategic and institutional uncertainty during Covid-19
Findings from a six-country empirical study
Bibliographic Data
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty is defined as limited knowledge or lack of predictability about past, present or future events. The COVID-19 pandemic management was significantly impacted by uncertainty, as the gaps between existing information and the necessary knowledge hindered decision-making. Current uncertainty literature primarily focuses on natural disasters, leaving a gap in understanding decision-making under uncertainty in times of public health emergencies. Analysing strategies for making decisions under uncertainty during the pandemic is crucial for future pandemic preparedness. METHODS: Using a comparative research design, we study the strategies governments used to make decisions under uncertainty during the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected data through desk reviews, stakeholder interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders from government, academia and civil society from six purposefully selected countries: Nigeria, Singapore, South Africa, Bangladesh, Jordan and the UK. RESULTS: Regardless of political, geographic and economic context, all six countries adopted common strategies to make decisions under three types of uncertainties. Decision-making under epistemic uncertainty involved seeking expert advice and collecting evidence from other countries and international organisations. Decision-making under strategic uncertainty involved coordination, collaboration and communication. Decision-making under institutional uncertainty involved using or adapting pre-existing experiences, structures and relationships and establishing new institutions and processes. CONCLUSIONS: We contribute to the theory and practice of public health crisis decision-making by presenting a unified national-level applied decision-making framework for events involving uncertainty. We provide practical guidance for approaches to enhance decision-making in future health crises that could also be used for other emergencies
Business · Economics · Management science · Political science · Preparedness · Public health · Public relations · Stakeholder · Uncertainty · COVID-19 impact on air quality · Disaster Management and Resilience · Medicine · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Uncertainty and Covid-19
Covid-19
Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science
The World Health Organization's Actions Within the United Nations System to Facilitate a Whole-of-Society Response to Covid-19 at Country Level
Governance of the Covid-19 response
National health governance, science and the media
The governance shock doctrine
‘Building a Ship while Sailing It.’ Epistemic Humility and the Temporality of Non-knowledge in Political Decision-making on Covid-19
Decision making under deep uncertainty for pandemic policy planning
The Role of Institutional Uncertainty for Social Sustainability of Companies and Supply Chains
How have researchers defined institutions, politics, organizations and governance in research related to epidemic and pandemic response? A scoping review to map current concepts
How do state authorities act under existential uncertainty? Hypotheses on the social logic of political decision-making processes during the Coronavirus pandemic
The Relationship between Government and Civil Society in the Era of Covid-19
The epistemic uncertainty of Covid-19
Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making
Culture, Institution, and Covid-19 First-Response Policy
Science skepticism in times of Covid-19
Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during Covid-19
Explaining Intergovernmental Coordination during the Covid-19 Pandemic
How trust, mistrust and distrust shape the governance of the Covid-19 crisis
Implementation failures revisited
Governments cannot just 'follow the science' on Covid-19
Encapsulation
The making of public health emergencies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |