Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Co-Creation From the Grassroots

Listening to Arts-Based Community Organizing in Little Tokyo

Bibliographic Data

ID22018607
AuthorsJonathan Jae-An Crisman (0000-0003-0091-4630, University of Arizona, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue3
Publication date2022-07-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v7i3.5336
OpenAlexW4287958822
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited29

Co-creation has been adopted by some as a new paradigm for collaborative and participatory planning, especially through the introduction of creative and artistic practices which can disrupt the problematic power relationships latent within urban projects and knowledge creation. Co-creation research, however, has often focused on practices which connect empowered institutional actors, such as city planning officials, from the top down to less empowered grassroots and community actors. Co-creation can take myriad forms, however, and I use evidence from the Los Angeles community of Little Tokyo to, first, model grassroots-driven co-creation. Second, this example shows how empowered actors can practice “listening” as defined within public spheres literature to better respond to grassroots-driven co-creation. Third, Little Tokyo has also been the site of another promising form of co-creation practice: horizontal co-creation across multiple grassroots actors. In sum, I argue that co-creation practices which emanate from the grassroots can provide valuable insights, further a more just and inclusive city, and deserve more attention

Active listening · Citizen journalism · Grassroots · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Administration · Service and Product Innovation

  • The ABCs of DEI in ACDs

    Open Access•Jonathan Jae-An Crisman, Carolyn Loh et al.•Urban Studies•2026

  • Co-Creation and the City

    Open Access•Juliet Carpenter, Christina Horvath•Urban Planning•2022

  • Pedagogies of sustainability and radical care

    T Firinci Orman, Zeynep Kaynar et al.•Local Environment•2025

  • Bridging the Macro, Meso and Micro Levels of Designer–Artisan Co‐Design

    Open Access•Jianan Hu, Eunsuk Hur et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Democracy as creative practice

    Jonathan Jae-An Crisman•Cultural Trends•2025

  • Turn of Events

    Open Access•Claire Nelischer, Andres F Ramirez et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2025

  • Values and challenges of participatory art in urban and community development

    Open Access•Zichen Ke•Frontiers in Sociology•2025

  • Co-creation of community micro-renewals

    Open Access•Yuxi Li, Shuai Zhang et al.•Habitat International•2023

  • The Dissonance of Democracy

    Susan Bickford•Dissonance of Democracy•2018

  • Planning theory revisited

    John Friedmann•European Planning Studies•1998

  • Co-creation experiences

    Open Access•C K Prahalad, Venkat Ramaswamy•Journal of Interactive Marketing•2004

  • A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    W H Voorberg, V J J M Bekkers et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Democratizing Inequalities

    Gianpaolo Baiocchi, Craig Calhoun et al.•Democratizing Inequalities•2015

  • Black Bloggers and Their Varied Publics

    Open Access•Catherine Knight Steele•Television & New Media•2017

  • Rethinking the Black Public Sphere

    Open Access•Catherine R Squires•Communication Theory•2002

  • Listening across difference

    T Dreher•Continuum•2009

  • Bringing Power to Planning Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Journal of Planning Education and…•2002

  • Power, Trust, and Planning

    Open Access•Stanley M Stein, Thomas L Harper•Journal of Planning Education and…•2003

  • Calling Nikkei to Empire

    Open Access•Daniel Iwama, Karen Umemoto et al.•Journal of Historical Geography•2021

  • Co-Creation as an agonistic practice in the favela of Santa Marta, Rio de Janeiro

    Open Access•Juliet Carpenter, Christina Horvath et al.•Urban Studies•2021

  • Agon'izing Over Consensus

    Open Access•Jack Hillier•Planning Theory•2003

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • Constructing Inequality

    Open Access•Susan Bickford•Political Theory•2000

  • Listening

    Open Access•Amy Dobson, Andrew Dobson•Political Studies•2012

  • Situating Communicative Planning Theory

    Open Access•Pauline Mcguirk, P M Mcguirk•Environment and Planning A…•2001

  • Rethinking the Public Sphere

    Nancy Fraser•Social Text•1990

  • No Contest

    Michael Mcquarrie•Public Culture•2013

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae