Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agon'izing Over Consensus

Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real

Bibliographic Data

ID8091136
AuthorsJack Hillier (0000-0002-7340-2073, Curtin University, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume2
Issue1
Pages37-59
Publication date2003-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePlanning Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1473-0952 • E-ISSN: 1741-3052
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1473095203002001005
OpenAlexW2078793116
LanguageEN
Citations received188
References cited29

I explore the core Habermasian concept of rational consensus-formation and its counterfactuality before introducing the possibility of permanence of conflict, non-reciprocity and domination (i.e. of agonism) which may productively explain some of the powergames enacted in planning decision-making. In so doing I draw on the concept of agonism and introduce the political into Habermas' moral theorization. Where the personal and the political intersect there is a role for psychology. I illustrate how Habermas' communicative theorizing was itself partly developed from a psychoanalytical tradition before introducing some of the concepts popularized by Jacques Lacan. I conclude that development of communicative planning theory could usefully retain some of Habermas' psychological foundations while turning to the work of Lacan as a basis for an enhanced understanding of the realities of planning practice

Agonism · Communicative action · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology · Social science · Sociology · Critical Realism in Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Philosophy · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Creative Placemaking

    Open Access•Jamie Levine Daniel, Mirae Kim•Journal of Public and Nonprofit…•2020

  • Resident action and urban planning in post-political Sydney

    Open Access•D Rogers, Cameron Mcauliffe et al.•Australian Planner•2026

  • Can a Park Save the City

    Open Access•Konrad Miciukiewicz•Przegląd Kulturoznawczy•2020

  • Writing Transpacifically

    Open Access•Foong P Chan•Folk, knowledge, place•2024

  • Co-Creation From the Grassroots

    Open Access•Jonathan Jae-An Crisman•Urban Planning•2022

  • Comparative Planning Research, Learning, and Governance

    Open Access•K Van Assche, Raoul Beunen et al.•Urban Planning•2020

  • Online Podcast Production as Co-Creation for Intercultural Participation in Neighbourhood Development

    Open Access•Robert Barbarino, Bianca Herlo et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • Collaboration in action

    Open Access•Lieselot Vandenbussche, Jurian Edelenbos et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Multiple Dimensions of Strategic Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Kaisa Granqvist, Hanna Mattila et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2021

  • Handling Compounded Uncertainty in Spatial Planning and Humanitarian Action in Unexpected Floods in Wayanad, Kerala

    Open Access•Mrudhula Koshy, Rolee Aranya et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2022

  • Ethnographic Knowledge in Urban Planning – Bridging the Gap between the Theories of Knowledge-Based and Communicative Planning

    Open Access•Hanna Mattila, Pia Olsson et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2022

  • On Theories and Practices of Collective Action and Sustained Cooperation

    Open Access•Atul Pokharel, John Forester et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2024

  • Centering Equity and Justice in Participatory Climate Action Planning

    Kayleigh Swanson•Planning Theory & Practice•2023

  • The Challenge of the Digital Public Sphere

    Open Access•Hanna Mattila, Pilvi Nummi•Planning Theory & Practice•2022

  • The Intermediating Role of Municipal Urban Planners in Online Discussions with Citizens

    Open Access•Jonas Sjöblom, Annaliina Niitamo•Planning Theory & Practice•2020

  • Inimby? The potential of automated social media bots to create echo chambers in the online participatory planning discourse

    Maxwell Hartt, Stephanie Cantlay et al.•International Planning Studies•2024

  • Planning in no one’s backyard

    Annaliina Niitamo•European Planning Studies•2021

  • The rationalities of strategic planning

    Open Access•Hanna Mattila, Matti Vatilo et al.•European Planning Studies•2024

  • Back and forth between openness and focusing

    Open Access•Patrik Tornberg, John Odhage•European Planning Studies•2022

  • Transformative thinking and urban living labs in planning practice

    Open Access•Agatino Rizzo, Abdolrasoul Habibipour et al.•European Planning Studies•2021

  • Transitions in planning

    Open Access•Jani P Lukkarinen, Hanna Nieminen et al.•European Planning Studies•2023

  • Making sense of exceptional planning decisions

    Open Access•Mirka Virtanen•European Planning Studies•2025

  • Habermas revisited

    Open Access•Hanna Mattila•Progress in Planning•2020

  • The public interest- schools of thought in planning

    Open Access•Ailin Sheydayi, Hashem Dadashpoor•Progress in Planning•2022

  • Timber beds, protests and publics

    Christopher Maidment•Town Planning Review•2021

  • Mind the widening ‘theory–practice gap’? The retreat to positivism in planning practice

    Open Access•Carol Ludwig, Olivier Sykes et al.•Town Planning Review•2024

  • On Deliberators’ Awareness of Attitude Transformation

    Open Access•Alexander Hellquist•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2023

  • A participatory e-planning model in the urban renewal of China

    Open Access•Li Tian, Tian Li et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2023

  • Demonstrating the benefits of impact assessment for proponents

    Angus Morrison-Saunders, Alex Bond et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2015

  • L acan on urban development and national identity in a global city

    Open Access•Nathan Bullock, Nathan F Bullock•Singapore Journal of Tropical…•2014

  • Interactive tangible planning support systems and politics of public participation

    Open Access•Tomaž Pipan•Urbani izziv•2018

  • Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’

    Geraint Ellis, John Barry et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2007

  • Building the Foundations of Collaboration

    Open Access•Zohreh Karaminejad, Suzanne Vallance et al.•Current Urban Studies•2020

  • Navigating the paradox of consensus

    Open Access•Emrah Ozdemir, Tuna Taşan-Kok•Planning Theory•2026

  • Rethinking Leadership in Urban Planning

    Open Access•Mari Jaakonaho, Z Bergman•Planning Theory & Practice•2026

  • Resourcing local communities for climate adaptive designs in Victoria, Australia

    Open Access•Rob Roggema, Lisa Vos et al.•Chinese Journal of Population…•2014

  • On the role of values in judgements on conflicting planning processes – prospects for agonistic planning? Basic considerations from Germany

    Open Access•Sabine Bongers-Römer, Christian Diller•Planning Practice and Research•2024

  • Bypassing Publicity for Getting Things Done

    Pia Bäcklund, Liisa Häikiö et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2017

  • How to Turn a Planning Conflict into a Planning Success? Conditions for Constructive Conflict Management in the Case of Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp, Belgium

    Tom Coppens•Planning Practice and Research•2014

  • Planning Research ‘with’ Minorities in Palermo

    Francesco Lo Piccolo•Planning Practice and Research•2008

  • Participative Planning Processes in the Absence of the (Public) Space of Democracy

    Giulia Bonafede, Francesco Lo Piccolo•Planning Practice and Research•2010

  • Why multi-stakeholder practices don’t work

    Daniela De Leo, Sara Altamore•Planning Practice and Research•2023

  • Rehabilitating utopias

    Open Access•Joey Koning, Terry Van Dijk•Planning Practice and Research•2024

  • The Role of Anticipatory Governance in Local Climate Adaptation

    Silvia Serrao-Neumann, Ben P Harman et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2013

  • ‘Are we in agreement?’ Process architecture considerations as a tool for navigating stakeholder perspectives in favor of consensus-building in land consolidation projects

    Open Access•N A Lindhout, Terry Van Dijk et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2025

  • Negotiating Integrated Land and Transport Development

    Open Access•Jinshuo Wang, D Ary Samsura et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2020

  • Online public deliberation for a regional transportation improvement decision

    Open Access•Michael Lowry, Michael B Lowry•Transportation•2010

  • Resisting Neoliberalization

    Open Access•Mark Purcell•Planning Theory•2009

  • Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World

    Open Access•Ralf Brand, Frank Gaffikin•Planning Theory•2007

  • The online conversion framework

    Open Access•Ruth Potts, J Iverson Riddle et al.•Planning Theory•2024

  • Building illusory unity with Ernesto Laclau – Why ‘closure’ should not be a dirty word in planning theory

    Open Access•Aino Hirvola•Planning Theory•2025

  • Whose knowledge counts? Knowledge mobilization and legitimation in environmental conflicts

    Open Access•Kato Van Speybroeck, Trui Steen et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2026

  • Superando abordagens colaborativa e agonística do planejamento

    Open Access•Richard Randolph•Cadernos Metrópole•2019

  • Creating an “in-between

    Open Access•Robert Barbarino, Hanna Seydel•Journal of Urban Affairs•2024

  • Unveiling inequity

    Open Access•Kayleigh Swanson•Cities•2025

  • Embedding justice into climate policies through participatory approaches

    Open Access•Cassandra Fontana, Andrea Testi et al.•Cities•2025

  • Seeing from the South

    Open Access•Watson•Urban Studies•2009

  • The resource curse and the role of institutions revisited

    Open Access•John Narh•Environment Development and…•2023

  • Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective

    Open Access•Jin Xue•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Counter Land-Grabbing by the Precariat

    Open Access•Clara Irazabal Zurita•Urban Science•2018

  • Politics of recognition in between antagonism and agonism

    Open Access•Ronnen Ben-Arie, Tovi Fenster•Environment and Planning C…•2019

  • From stage-managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning

    Open Access•Louis Albrechts, Angela Barbanente et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2019

  • Governing ‘places that don’t matter’

    Open Access•Hanna Mattila, Eva Purkarthofer et al.•Territory Politics Governance•2020

  • Building a conceptual spatial framework

    Open Access•Henrietta Palmer•Sustainability Science•2025

  • A continual engagement framework to tackle wicked problems

    Open Access•Luis Tapia, Daniela Pedroza-Páez et al.•Sustainability Science•2016

  • Seeking the good (peace) of the republic

    Open Access•Johann-Albrecht Meylahn•Verbum et Ecclesia•2011

  • The empire of the narrative

    Open Access•L Matthey, Julie Ambal et al.•Planning Theory•2022

  • Legitimising activism in democracy

    Open Access•Lillian Fougère, Sharon Bond•Planning Theory•2016

  • Strange spaces

    Open Access•J Metzger•Planning Theory•2011

  • Post-Liberalism

    Open Access•A Roy•Planning Theory•2008

  • Kabul cosmopolitan

    Open Access•Pietro Calogero•Planning Theory•2011

  • Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’

    Open Access•Sharon Bond•Planning Theory•2011

  • City-stories

    Open Access•Jennifer Tucker•Planning Theory•2015

  • On the other side of “agonism”

    Open Access•Nikolai Roskamm•Planning Theory•2014

  • Dilemmas of planning

    Open Access•Federico Savini, Stan Majoor et al.•Planning Theory•2014

  • The role of the expert knowledge in politicizing urban planning processes

    Open Access•Emrah Ozdemir•Planning Theory•2018

  • Strife

    Open Access•John Pløger•Planning Theory•2004

  • Using Actor–Network Theory to understand planning practice

    Open Access•Yvonne Rydin•Planning Theory•2012

  • Informal strategies of power in the local planning system

    Open Access•Linda Fox-Rogers, Enda Murphy•Planning Theory•2013

  • Unsettling planning theory

    Open Access•Janice Barry, Janis Barry et al.•Planning Theory•2018

  • Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning

    Open Access•Jack Hillier, Michael Gunder•Planning Theory•2003

  • The political ambivalences of participatory planning initiatives

    Open Access•Elisabet Van Wymeersch, Stijn Oosterlynck et al.•Planning Theory•2018

  • The longue durée of community engagement

    Open Access•Peter Matthews•Planning Theory•2012

  • On ‘the subject’ of planning’s public interest

    Open Access•Mick Lennon•Planning Theory•2016

  • Constitutional and post-constitutional problems

    Open Access•Stefano Moroni•Planning Theory•2018

  • Articulating virtue

    Open Access•Katie Mcclymont•Planning Theory•2018

  • Badiou, Haussmann and Saint-Simon

    Open Access•Antoine Paccoud•Planning Theory•2018

  • Realizing Planning's Emancipatory Promise

    Open Access•Clara Irazabal Zurita•Planning Theory•2009

  • Applying Lacanian Insight and a Dash of Derridean Deconstruction to Planning’s ‘Dark Side’

    Open Access•Phil Allmendinger, Michael Gunder•Planning Theory•2005

  • An introduction

    Open Access•Michael Gunder•Planning Theory•2011

  • The enemy within

    Open Access•Arata D Yamamoto•Planning Theory•2017

  • Reframing postmodern planning with feminist social theory

    Open Access•Ihnji Jon•Planning Theory•2019

  • Beyond the post-political

    Open Access•Crystal Legacy, J Metzger et al.•Planning Theory•2019

  • Planning in the face of ‘deep divisions’

    Open Access•Christine Mady, Angelique Chettiparamb•Planning Theory•2016

  • Postpolitical correctness

    Open Access•Jonas Bylund•Planning Theory•2012

  • Rationality revisited

    Open Access•Emrah Ozdemir•Planning Theory•2021

  • The politics of value in urban development

    Open Access•Cameron Mcauliffe, D Rogers•Planning Theory•2019

  • Revitalising the political

    Open Access•Katie Mcclymont•Planning Theory•2011

  • Fake it until you make it, and then

    Open Access•Michael Gunder•Planning Theory•2011

  • Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning

    Open Access•Alex Lord•Planning Theory•2013

  • Two Fugitive Democracy

    Sheldon S Wolin•Democracy and Difference•1996

  • Public Participation and the Art of Governance

    Open Access•John Pløger•Environment and Planning B…•2001

  • The Human Condition

    Hannah Arendt, Margaret Canovan et al.•Human Condition•2018

  • The Postnational Constellation

    Jürgen Habermas•Canadian Journal of Communication•2002

  • Fantasies and Realities in University-Community Partnerships

    Open Access•Howell S Baum, H Baum•Journal of Planning Education and…•2000

  • Communication and the Evolution of Society

    Dieter Misgeld, Jürgen Habermas et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1981

  • Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action

    David Weberman, Jürgen Habermas et al.•The Philosophical Review•1992

  • The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas

    Julius Sensat, Thomas Mccarthy•The Philosophical Review•1980

  • Knowledge and Human Interests

    Howard L Parsons, Jürgen Habermas et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1972

  • The Inclusion of the Other

    Jürgen Habermas•The inclusion of the other•1996

  • Social Movements And Culture

    Hank Johnston, Bert Klandermans•Social Movements and Culture•2013

  • Publicity's Secret

    Open Access•Jodi Dean•Political Theory•2001

  • Construing Disagreement

    Open Access•Gary Shiffman•Political Theory•2002

  • Beyond Good and Evil

    Open Access•William E Connolly•Political Theory•1993

  • Situating Communicative Planning Theory

    Open Access•Pauline Mcguirk, P M Mcguirk•Environment and Planning A…•2001

  • Yet Again

    Jürgen Habermas•New German Critique•1991

  • Between Facts and Norms

    Jürgen Habermas•Between Facts and Norms•1996

  • Social Groups in Associative Democracy

    Open Access•Iris Marion Young•Latin American Politics and Society•1992

  • A Deliberative Perspective on Neocorporatism

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•Politics & Society•1992

  • Power as an art of contingency

    Alain Pottage•Economy and Society•1998

Unique citing works188
Citations per year8,17
Citation span2003 - 2026 (24)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 188
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae