Smart Engagement in Small Cities
Exploring Minority Participation in Planning
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22018626 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Shakil bin Kashem (0000-0001-7333-4093, Kansas State University), Dora Gallo (Kansas State University) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Número | 2 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-04-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Editorial | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.v8i2.6607 |
| OpenAlex | W4366826069 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 52 |
Smart engagement approaches are now widely applied in community planning processes. However, there continues to be a lack of representation from marginalized groups such as racial/ethnic minorities in planning processes. In this study, we explore what smart community engagement methods are being applied by small cities in the U.S., and how minority communities are participating in the planning process with those engagement methods. We analyzed planning documents and public engagement data from five small cities located in different regions of the U.S. with varying levels of minority populations. We evaluated the planning processes of the study cities, specifically comprehensive planning, and what smart community engagement tools they have applied. Our study shows that smart engagements are performed primarily through community surveys and online outreach initiatives. Despite adopting these approaches, most cities received lower participation from minority populations compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Cities with higher participation rates provided more engagement opportunities and conducted targeted community events and surveys to reach out to minority and low-income communities. From this study, we conclude that cities should apply varied methods for community engagement and should not rely solely on smart approaches to engage with minority communities. For cities to increase their overall civic participation, including those underrepresented, smart engagement approaches should be supported by targeted public events and outreach activities
Civic engagement · Community engagement · Ethnic group · Ethnically diverse · Outreach · Political science · Politics · Public engagement · Public participation · Public relations · Sociology · Youth engagement · E-Government and Public Services · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Smart Cities and Technologies
Maximising urban resilience using sustainable drainage systems (SuDS)
Smart Engagement and Smart Urbanism
Co‐Creation in Automated Public Space Lighting Design
A Weak Link in Efforts to Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing? Evaluating Public Engagement Processes in Housing Plan Development in Southern California
Decision support for inclusive spatial planning in the European geographical context
Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications
General Plan Evaluation Criteria
Making Plans that Matter
The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation
The ethics of smart cities and urban science
Structural Racism and Immigrant Health in the United States
Frameworks for citizens participation in planning
An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development
Exploring the nexus between social vulnerability, built environment, and the prevalence of Covid-19
The New Generation of Public Participation
From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism
Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning and Policy
Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement
It is not just who you know
Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects
Latinx and Black young adults’ pathways to civic/political engagement
E-Governance and Smart Communities
Who Participates and Why
An Evaluation of Three Democratic, Community-Based Approaches to Citizen Participation
Sustainable eGovernance? Practices, problems and beliefs about the future in Swedish eGov practice
Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion
Local Knowledge in Action
Community Participation in Urban Sanitation
Planning for Climate Adaptation
Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management
The Perils of Participatory Discourse
Political Trust among Chicago Latinos
Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city
Collaborative planning in the new media age
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Racial Disparities in Public Meeting Participation? Examining Past Evidence and Nationally Representative Data
Dimensions of Public Meeting Participation
Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance
Citizen Participation in Decision Making
Determinants of Rural Latino Trust in the Federal Government
Conflicting rationalities
Will the real smart city please stand up
Racial Gerrymandering of Municipal Borders
Development and Validation of the Critical Consciousness Scale
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |