Health Care Worker Perspectives of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery in Central Uganda
Bibliographic Data
Background: Scale-up of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services in Uganda is ongoing. However, health care workers (HCWs) may not be aware of PrEP nor what offering this service entails. We explored the impact of standardized HCW training on the knowledge and perspectives of PrEP service delivery in Uganda. Methods: We recruited HCWs from facilities that offered HIV-related services in Central Uganda. Using the Uganda Ministry of Health curriculum, we trained HCWs on PrEP services. We collected data about PrEP knowledge, preparedness, and willingness to deliver PrEP to multiple key populations before the training, immediately after the training, and >6 months later (exit). We additionally conducted 15 qualitative interviews after the exit survey. Quantitative data were analyzed by Fisher exact test, while qualitative interview data were analyzed inductively. Results: = 15, 18%). Surveys indicated that awareness of PrEP increased after the training and remained high. Knowledge of PrEP (i.e., as an effective, short-term antiretroviral medication to use before HIV exposure for people at high risk) generally increased with training, but significant gaps remained, and knowledge decreased with time. Most HCWs recommended PrEP for female sex workers and HIV serodifferent couples, as well as other key populations. We observed increases in the number of HCW who felt their facility was prepared to cater for HIV prevention and provide PrEP, but this view was not universal. HCWs believed in PrEP effectiveness and embraced it as an additional HIV prevention method. Concerns included patient adherence and behavioral risk compensation. HCWs noted challenges in PrEP delivery in terms of inadequate clinic preparedness, infrastructure, staff capacity, and poor attitudes toward key populations by untrained health workers. They felt further training was needed to ensure a smooth scale-up of services without stigmatization. Conclusions: Standardized training improved knowledge, willingness, and preparedness to offer PrEP services among most HCWs in Central Uganda. Ongoing training will be needed to optimize PrEP delivery services and expand delivery to levels needed for population-level impact
Business · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health services · Men who have sex with men · Population · Pre-exposure prophylaxis · Service delivery framework · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Infection Control in Healthcare · Medicine · Nursing · Sex work and related issues
The use of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among people who inject drugs
Determinants of continuation on HIV pre-exposure propylaxis among female sex workers at a referral hospital in Uganda
The experience of healthcare workers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in low- and middle-income countries
Healthcare workers’ perspectives on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa
Availability and readiness of public health facilities to provide differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Zambia
Female sex worker preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery in Uganda
Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations
HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women in Africa
Understanding, Contextualizing, and Addressing PrEP Stigma to Enhance PrEP Implementation
Persistent stigmatizing and negative perceptions of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users
Training health care providers to provide PrEP for HIV serodiscordant couples attending public health facilities in Kenya
Community perspectives on barriers and challenges to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis access by men who have sex with men and female sex workers access in Nigeria
HIV Providers’ Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Care Settings
Understanding Demand for PrEP and Early Experiences of PrEP Use Among Young Adults in Rural Kenya and Uganda
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |