Deception and Arousal
Isolating the Behavioral Correlates of Deception
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2269501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark A Turck (Cornell University), Gerald R Miller (0009-0002-2561-3535, Michigan State University) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 181-201 |
| Publication date | 1985-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Communication Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00072.x |
| OpenAlex | W1505159691 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 31 |
This study tested a physiologically based arousal theory of deceptive communication. The sympathetic activation (skin resistance) of three groups of communicators was monitored. Two of the groups, deceivers and unaroused truth tellers, paralleled the types of communicators used in earlier deception studies; and a third group, aroused truth tellers, was exposed to a noise stimulus to raise their sympathetic activation to a level comparable to deceivers. Comparison of the behavioral differences between comparably aroused deceivers and truth tellers made it possible to identify the cues unique to deception-induced arousal. Results confirmed that deceivers experienced significantly greater sympathetic activation than unaroused truth tellers. Six verbal and nonverbal behaviors reliably distinguished deceivers from unaroused truth tellers, and, most important, these same six behaviors reliably distinguished deceivers from aroused truth tellers
Arousal · Cognitive psychology · Deception · Nonverbal communication · Skin conductance · Stimulus (psychology · Communication · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology · Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception
Scientific jury selection.
Shedding light on deception
The structure of deception
Mining Bodily Cues to Deception
The Location of Maximum Emotion in Deceptive and Truthful Texts
Deception
Confounding influences on police detection of suspiciousness
Toward a better understanding of racial and ethnic disparities in search and seizure rates
The Nature of Arousal and Nonverbal Indices
Nonverbal indicators of deception
Cues to deception
Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors as Afunction of Deception Type
Insight Into Behavior Displayed During Deception
Training Lie Detectors to Use Nonverbal Cues Instead of Global Heuristics
Training Observers to Detect Deception Effects of Self-Monitoring and Rehearsal
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Nonverbal indicators of deception
Nonverbal communication and deception
Dissonance arousal
Studies in forced compliance
Learning to detect deception
Detecting deception from the body or face
Individual differences and cues to deception
Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar
Physiological measures and the detection of deception
The detection of deception
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance
Self-Monitoring, Rehearsal, and Deceptive Communication
Prepared Lies, Spontaneous Lies, Machiavellianism, and Nonverbal Communication
Detecting Deception
The Truth-Deception Attribution
Detecting Deceptive Communication From Verbal, Visual, and Paralinguistic Cues1
An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,43 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 2026 (38) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |