Peer Support in Mental Health

Literature Review

Bibliographic Data

ID23315156
AuthorsReham Shalaby (0000-0002-3717-6398, University of Alberta, corresponding author), Vincent I O Agyapong (0000-0002-2743-0372, University of Alberta)
Year2020
Volume7
Issue6
Pagese15572
Publication date2020-06-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJMIR Mental Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2368-7959 • E-ISSN: 2368-7959
PublisherJMIR Publications Inc. (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.2196/15572
PMID32357127
OpenAlexW3006370585
LanguageEN
Citations received97
References cited110

BACKGROUND: A growing gap has emerged between people with mental illness and health care professionals, which in recent years has been successfully closed through the adoption of peer support services (PSSs). Peer support in mental health has been variously defined in the literature and is simply known as the help and support that people with lived experience of mental illness or a learning disability can give to one another. Although PSSs date back to several centuries, it is only in the last few decades that these services have formally evolved, grown, and become an integral part of the health care system. Debates around peer support in mental health have been raised frequently in the literature. Although many authors have emphasized the utmost importance of incorporating peer support into the health care system to instill hope; to improve engagement, quality of life, self-confidence, and integrity; and to reduce the burden on the health care system, other studies suggest that there are neutral effects from integrating PSSs into health care systems, with a probable waste of resources. OBJECTIVE: In this general review, we aimed to examine the literature, exploring the evolution, growth, types, function, generating tools, evaluation, challenges, and the effect of PSSs in the field of mental health and addiction. In addition, we aimed to describe PSSs in different, nonexhaustive contexts, as shown in the literature, that aims to draw attention to the proposed values of PSSs in such fields. METHODS: The review was conducted through a general search of the literature on MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts, and PsycINFO. Search terms included peer support, peer support in mental health, social support, peer, family support, and integrated care. RESULTS: There is abundant literature defining and describing PSSs in different contexts as well as tracking their origins. Two main transformational concepts have been described, namely, intentional peer support and transformation from patients to peer support providers. The effects of PSSs are extensive and integrated into different fields, such as forensic PSSs, addiction, and mental health, and in different age groups and mental health condition severity. Satisfaction of and challenges to PSS integration have been clearly dependent on a number of factors and consequently impact the future prospect of this workforce. CONCLUSIONS: There is an internationally growing trend to adopt PSSs within addiction and mental health services, and despite the ongoing challenges, large sections of the current literature support the inclusion of peer support workers in the mental health care workforce. The feasibility and maintenance of a robust PSS in health care would only be possible through collaborative efforts and ongoing support and engagement from all health care practitioners, managers, and other stakeholders.

Mental health · Peer review · Peer support · Political science · Psychiatry · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology