Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health

A systematic methods overview

Bibliographic Data

ID23334058
AuthorsAlicia O’cathain (0000-0003-4033-506X, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Liz Croot (University of Sheffield), Katie Sworn (University of Sheffield), Edward Duncan (0000-0002-3400-905X, University of Stirling), Nikki Rousseau (0000-0001-8826-3515, University of Stirling), K Turner (0000-0002-6375-2918, University of Bristol), Liz Yardley (0000-0002-3853-883X, University of Bristol), Lucy Yardley, Pat Hoddinott (0000-0002-4372-9681, University of Stirling)
Year2019
Volume5
Issue1
Pages41-41
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePilot and Feasibility Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2055-5784 • E-ISSN: 2055-5784
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6
PMID30923626
OpenAlexW2922225337
LanguageEN
Citations received63
References cited45

BACKGROUND: Interventions need to be developed prior to the feasibility and piloting phase of a study. There are a variety of published approaches to developing interventions, programmes or innovations to improve health. Identifying different types of approach, and synthesising the range of actions taken within this endeavour, can inform future intervention development. METHODS: This study is a systematic methods overview of approaches to intervention development. Approaches were considered for inclusion if they described how to develop or adapt an intervention in a book, website or journal article published after 2007, or were cited in a primary research study reporting the development of a specific intervention published in 2015 or 2016. Approaches were read, a taxonomy of approaches was developed and the range of actions taken across different approaches were synthesised. RESULTS: Eight categories of approach to intervention development were identified. (1) Partnership, where people who will use the intervention participate equally with the research team in decision-making about the intervention throughout the development process. (2) Target population-centred, where the intervention is based on the views and actions of the people who will use it. (3) Evidence and theory-based, where the intervention is based on published research evidence and existing theories. (4) Implementation-based, where the intervention is developed with attention to ensuring it will be used in the real world. (5) Efficiency-based, where components of an intervention are tested using experimental designs to select components which will optimise efficiency. (6) Stepped or phased, where interventions are developed with an emphasis on following a systematic set of processes. (7) Intervention-specific, where an approach is constructed for a specific type of intervention. (8) Combination, where existing approaches to intervention development are formally combined. The actions from approaches in all eight categories were synthesised to identify 18 actions to consider when developing interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This overview of approaches to intervention development can help researchers to understand the variety of existing approaches, and to understand the range of possible actions involved in intervention development, prior to assessing feasibility or piloting the intervention. Findings from this overview will contribute to future guidance on intervention development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017080553.

General partnership · Inclusion (mineral) · Intervention (counseling) · Management science · MEDLINE · Political science · Psychological intervention · Set (abstract data type) · Systematic review · Variety (cybernetics) · Artificial Intelligence · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health, psychology, and well-being · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology