Making Moosic

The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts

Bibliographic Data

ID2931973
AuthorsMalcolm R Parks (University of Washington, corresponding author), Lynne D Roberts (0000-0003-0085-9213, Curtin University)
Year1998
Volume15
Issue4
Pages517-537
Publication date1998-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0265407598154005
OpenAlexW2105394865
LanguageEN
Citations received103
References cited20

Despite the rapid development of the Internet over the past decade and the associated media hyperbole about cyberspace relationships, there is a paucity of systematic research examining the prevalence, type and development of personal relationships in on-line settings. This research examines relational topography in real-time text-based virtual environments known as MOOs (Multi-User Dimensions, Object Oriented). Current users of MOOs (235) completed a survey on MOO relationships, with 155 also completing a survey on offline relationships. Almost all survey respondents (93.6%) had formed ongoing personal relationships on MOOs. The most commonly reported types of relationships were close friendships, friendships and romances. The majority of relationships formed (83.6%) was with members of the opposite sex. Levels of relational development (interdependence, depth, breadth, code change, commitment, predictability/understanding, network convergence) were typically moderate to high. Most relationships had migrated to other virtual environments, and a third had resulted in face-to-face meetings. On average, MOO relationships were found to be more developed than newsgroup relationships, but less developed than off-line relationships. It was concluded that MOOs provide an inherently social and powerful context for the formation of personal relationships, many of which will transfer to other settings

Context (archaeology · Cyberspace · Hyperbole · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance