Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates
A Specification of Historical Trends
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3730438 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Garand (0000-0001-5754-8673, Georgia State University), James C Garand, Donald A Gro, Donald A Gross (University of Kentucky) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 17-30 |
| Publication date | 1984-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1961246 |
| OpenAlex | W2325530246 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 46 |
| References cited | 30 |
Recent research on House elections has focused on the decline in congressional competition since the mid-1960s. However, this body of research suffers from three major problems: 1) an imprecise specification of the nature of change in the degree of congressional competition, 2) its exclusive reliance on a limited time frame, which calls into question the generalizability and adequacy of its explanations, and 3) its overemphasis on incumbency-oriented explanations. Using a Multiple Interrupted Time Series (MITS) analysis of trends in aggregate electoral data from 1824 to 1980, we find that current low levels of congressional competition are not historically unique, but instead constitute a continuation of a long-term trend established in the mid-1890s. In addition, and in contrast to the general thrust described in the literature, there appears to be a post-1965 trend toward greater competition, although the absolute level of competition is lower after the mid-1960s. Finally, a disaggregation of electoral results by incumbency status suggests a growth in the incumbency advantage since the mid-1890s, but that lower post-1965 levels of congressional competition are the result of a winners' and not an incumbency, advantage. Such findings cast doubt on the adequacy of explanations that focus on post-1965, incumbency-oriented factors
Competition (biology · Contrast (vision · Demographic economics · Econometrics · Economics · Generalizability theory · Political science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Psychology
Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections
No Space for Female Mayors in Romania
Using tax dollars for re-election
Similar Details, Different Interpretations
Out of the Past
Party Registration and Party Vote
The Polls
Term Limits as a Response to Incumbency Advantage
Using State Election Results to Predict the Fortunes of National Parties in Federal Polls in India
The behavior of congressional tenure over time
Measuring the ?personal vote? of members of Congress
Win, lose, or withdraw
Declining electoral competitiveness in the House of Representatives
Incumbency effects in political campaigns
A test of the revealed-preference phenomenon in congressional elections
Looking beyond reelection
A comparison of incumbent security in the House and Senate
Institutional and District‐Level Sources of Competition in State Legislative Elections
The Variable Incumbency Advantage
A regression discontinuity design analysis of the incumbency advantage and tenure in the U.S. House
Uncontested Seats and Electoral Competition for the U.S. House of Representatives Over Time
Changing Meanings of Electoral Marginality in U.S. House Elections, 1824-1978
Nationalization and the Incumbency Advantage
Vanishing Marginals in State Legislative Elections
Electoral Security of Members of the U.S. House, 1900–2006
The Effect of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections
Partisan and Incumbent Effects in State Legislative Redistricting
Tempus Fugit, Incumbency Stays
The Marginals Never Vanished
Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow
Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections
Congressmen, Perquisites, and Elections
Solving a Puzzle
Congressional Candidates in the Era of Party Ballots
The Emergence of the Personal Vote
The Vanishing Marginals, the Bandwagon, and the Mass Media
Candidates, Money, and Voters-Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research
Incumbency and Short-Term Influences on Voters
Regime Change in Presidential and Congressional Budgeting
Assessing the Electoral Connection
Sectional Differences in Partisan Bias and Electoral Responsiveness in US House Elections, 1850–1980
Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage
The 1896 Realignment
Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress
The New American Political Party
Are Majority Minority Districts Too Safe
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics
Partisan Realignment
Time-Series Analysis
Congress
Incumbents' Advantages in the 1978 U. S. Congressional Elections
Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House
The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives
House Incumbents and Inter-Election Vote Change
Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House
The Vanishing Marginals, 1824-1980
Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat
The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections
Congressional Elections
Regulatory Performance and Presidential Administration
Measuring Public Policy
Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional Elections
Can Government Regulate Safety? The Coal Mine Example
Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections
Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy
The American Voter in Congressional Elections
Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections
Theory and Voting Research
Toward a Diachronic Analysis of Congress
The American Party Systems
Incumbency, Electoral Safety, and Turnover in the House of Representatives, 1952-76
Some Economic Effects of Revolution
| Unique citing works | 46 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,12 |
| Citation span | 1985 - 2024 (40) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 46 |