Colonization of the Americas, 'Little Ice Age' climate, and bomb-produced carbon
Their role in defining the Anthropocene
Bibliographic Data
A recently published analysis by Lewis and Maslin (Lewis SL and Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519: 171-180) has identified two new potential horizons for the Holocene−Anthropocene boundary: 1610 (associated with European colonization of the Americas), or 1964 (the peak of the excess radiocarbon signal arising from atom bomb tests). We discuss both of these novel suggestions, and consider that there is insufficient stratigraphic basis for the former, whereas placing the latter at the peak of the signal rather than at its inception does not follow normal stratigraphical practice. Wherever the boundary is eventually placed, it should be optimized to reflect stratigraphical evidence with the least possible ambiguity
Ambiguity · Anthropocene · Archaeology · Artifact (error · Biology · Boundary (topology · Colonization · Geography · Holocene · Radiocarbon dating · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Geology and Paleoclimatology Research · History · Isotope Analysis in Ecology · Philosophy · Geology · Paleontology
The Concept of the Anthropocene
The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene
Songs of the New World and the Breath of the Planet at the Orbis Spike, 1610
The Anthropocene Concept in the Natural and Social Sciences, the Humanities and Law – A Bibliometric Analysis and a Qualitative Interpretation (2000–2020)
El Antropoceno, ¿un concepto geológico o cultural, o ambos
Global trade in the Anthropocene
Formal subdivision of the Quaternary System/Period
Marking the boundaries of stratigraphy
A benchmark for the environment
Copper content in anthropogenic sediments as a tracer for detecting smelting activities and its impact on environment during prehistoric period in Hexi Corridor, Northwest China
Beyond the ‘Anthropocene’ impasse
Introductory Remarks
Anthropocene – a cautious welcome from environmental sociology
The Anthroposcenic
El “Antropos” Del Antropoceno
Das Anthropozän. Eine Herausforderung für die Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Umwelt
Anthropogenic records in a fluvial depositional system
Getting the Anthropocene so wrong
The Anthropocene as a civil time unit
Introduction
Candidate sites and other reference sections for the Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point of the Anthropocene series
Cheapness and (labor-)power
Domesticating the future through history
The Anthropocene's dating problem
The Anthropocene as rupture
A transparent framework for defining the Anthropocene Epoch
Could a potential Anthropocene mass extinction define a new geological period
Planetary environing
Between History and Earth System Science
Governing the Anthropocene
The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate
Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis
Global Crisis
The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago
Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO2
Are we now living in the Anthropocene
Defining the epoch we live in
Holocene carbon-cycle dynamics based on CO2 trapped in ice at Taylor Dome, Antarctica
Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years
The Maunder Minimum
Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia
The Anthropocene
Defining the Anthropocene
Geology of mankind
The 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty
The Anthropocene
When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal
The onset of the Anthropocene
A sociometabolic reading of the Anthropocene
Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene
The trajectory of the Anthropocene
Is there an isotopic signature of the Anthropocene
| Unique citing works | 31 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,82 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 31 |