Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Colonization of the Americas, 'Little Ice Age' climate, and bomb-produced carbon

Their role in defining the Anthropocene

Bibliographic Data

ID4189148
AuthorsJ Zalasiewicz (0000-0002-3220-4855, University of Leicester), Colin N Waters (0000-0001-6113-8730, British Geological Survey), Anthony D Barnosky (0000-0003-0265-7113), Alejandro Cearreta (0000-0003-0100-1454, University of the Basque Country), Matt Edgeworth (0000-0002-9375-0753, University of Leicester), Erle C Ellis (0000-0002-2006-3362, University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Agnieszka Gałuszka (0000-0002-2497-2627, Jan Kochanowski University), Philip L Gibbard (0000-0001-9757-7292, University of Cambridge), Jacques Grinevald (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies), I Hajdas (0000-0003-2373-2725, ETH Zurich), Juliana A Ivar Do Sul (0000-0003-0851-3559), Juliana Ivar Do Sul (Association of Polar Early Career Scientists, Brazil), Catherine Jeandel (0000-0002-4915-4719, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Reinhold Leinfelder (0000-0002-4107-2161, Freie Universität Berlin), Jr Mcneill (Georgetown University), Claire Poirier (0000-0002-8311-8463, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Andrew Revkin (0000-0002-0170-0311, Pace Academy for Advanced Environmental Studies, USA), Clément Poirier, Will Steffen (0000-0003-1163-6736, Australian National University), Daniel Deb Richter (0000-0003-3547-433X), Colin Summerhayes (0000-0002-4638-4260, University of Cambridge), James P M Syvitski (0000-0001-7748-542X, University of Colorado Boulder), Davor Vidas (0000-0001-8134-7425, Fridtjof Nansen Institute), James Pm Syvitski, Michael Wagreich (0000-0002-8828-0857, University of Vienna), Mark Williams (0000-0002-7987-6069, University of Leicester), Alexander P Wolfe (University of Alberta)
Year2015
Volume2
Issue2
Pages117-127
Publication date2015-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Anthropocene Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-0196 • E-ISSN: 2053-020X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2053019615587056
OpenAlexW2158273866
LanguageEN
Citations received31
References cited48

A recently published analysis by Lewis and Maslin (Lewis SL and Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519: 171-180) has identified two new potential horizons for the Holocene−Anthropocene boundary: 1610 (associated with European colonization of the Americas), or 1964 (the peak of the excess radiocarbon signal arising from atom bomb tests). We discuss both of these novel suggestions, and consider that there is insufficient stratigraphic basis for the former, whereas placing the latter at the peak of the signal rather than at its inception does not follow normal stratigraphical practice. Wherever the boundary is eventually placed, it should be optimized to reflect stratigraphical evidence with the least possible ambiguity

Ambiguity · Anthropocene · Archaeology · Artifact (error · Biology · Boundary (topology · Colonization · Geography · Holocene · Radiocarbon dating · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Geology and Paleoclimatology Research · History · Isotope Analysis in Ecology · Philosophy · Geology · Paleontology

  • The Concept of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Y Malhi•Annual Review of Environment and…•2017

  • The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene

    Open Access•Colin N Waters, J Zalasiewicz et al.•Science•2016

  • Songs of the New World and the Breath of the Planet at the Orbis Spike, 1610

    Andrew J Chung•Journal of the American…•2023

  • The Anthropocene Concept in the Natural and Social Sciences, the Humanities and Law – A Bibliometric Analysis and a Qualitative Interpretation (2000–2020)

    Open Access•Hans Günter Brauch•Paul J. Crutzen and the…•2021

  • El Antropoceno, ¿un concepto geológico o cultural, o ambos

    Open Access•Helmuth Trischler•Desacatos•2017

  • Global trade in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•John Brolin, Astrid Kander•The Anthropocene Review•2022

  • Formal subdivision of the Quaternary System/Period

    Open Access•Martin J Head, Philip L Gibbard•Quaternary International•2015

  • Marking the boundaries of stratigraphy

    Open Access•Johannes Lundershausen•Geo Geography and Environment•2018

  • A benchmark for the environment

    Open Access•Benjamin W Goossen•Journal of Global History•2020

  • Copper content in anthropogenic sediments as a tracer for detecting smelting activities and its impact on environment during prehistoric period in Hexi Corridor, Northwest China

    Open Access•Yishi Yang, G Dong et al.•The Holocene•2016

  • Beyond the ‘Anthropocene’ impasse

    Open Access•Ritwik Ranjan•Futures•2024

  • Introductory Remarks

    J R Mcneill, John Mcneill•Eighteenth-Century Studies•2016

  • Anthropocene – a cautious welcome from environmental sociology

    Open Access•Rolf Lidskog, Claire Waterton•Environmental Sociology•2016

  • The Anthroposcenic

    Open Access•David Matle, David Matless•Transactions of the Institute of…•2017

  • El “Antropos” Del Antropoceno

    Open Access•Daniel Chernilo•Novos Rumos Sociológicos•2021

  • Das Anthropozän. Eine Herausforderung für die Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Umwelt

    Open Access•Helmuth Trischler•NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte…•2016

  • Anthropogenic records in a fluvial depositional system

    Open Access•Martin Faměra, Tomáš Matys Grygar et al.•Anthropocene•2021

  • Getting the Anthropocene so wrong

    Open Access•Clive Hamilton•The Anthropocene Review•2015

  • The Anthropocene as a civil time unit

    Open Access•Ulrich Stange•The Anthropocene Review•2024

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Christoph Rosol, Sara Nelson et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2017

  • Candidate sites and other reference sections for the Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point of the Anthropocene series

    Open Access•Colin N Waters, D Turner et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2023

  • Cheapness and (labor-)power

    Open Access•Joshua R Eichen•Environment and Planning D…•2020

  • Domesticating the future through history

    Open Access•Zoltán B Simon•Time & Society•2021

  • The Anthropocene's dating problem

    Open Access•Kyle Nichols, Bina Gogineni•The Anthropocene Review•2018

  • The Anthropocene as rupture

    Open Access•Clive Hamilton•The Anthropocene Review•2016

  • A transparent framework for defining the Anthropocene Epoch

    Open Access•Su Lin Lewis, Simon L Lewis et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2015

  • Could a potential Anthropocene mass extinction define a new geological period

    Open Access•Karen L Bacon, Graeme T Swindles•The Anthropocene Review•2016

  • Planetary environing

    Open Access•Sverker Sörlin•The Anthropocene Review•2025

  • Between History and Earth System Science

    Deborah R Coen, Fredrik Albritton Jonsson•Isis•2022

  • Governing the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Gerard Delanty, Aurea Mota•European Journal of Social Theory•2017

  • The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate

    Open Access•Daniel Chernilo•European Journal of Social Theory•2017

  • Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis

    Open Access•Thomas F Stocker•Climate Change 2013 - the…•2014

  • Global Crisis

    G Parker•Global Crisis•2013

  • The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago

    Open Access•William F Ruddiman•Climatic Change•2003

  • Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO2

    Open Access•J M Barnola, Jean-Marc Barnola et al.•Nature•1987

  • Are we now living in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•J Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams et al.•GSA Today•2008

  • Defining the epoch we live in

    Open Access•William F Ruddiman, Erle C Ellis et al.•Science•2015

  • Holocene carbon-cycle dynamics based on CO2 trapped in ice at Taylor Dome, Antarctica

    Open Access•Andreas Indermühle, Thomas F Stocker et al.•Nature•1999

  • Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years

    Open Access•J Jouzel, Valérie Masson‐delmotte et al.•Science•2007

  • The Maunder Minimum

    Open Access•John A Eddy•Science•1976

  • Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia

    Open Access•M Mann, Michael E Mann et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • The Anthropocene

    Open Access•J Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2011

  • Defining the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Su Lin Lewis, Simon L Lewis et al.•Nature•2015

  • Geology of mankind

    Open Access•Paul J Crutzen, Sheldon A Zabel•Nature•2002

  • The 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

    Vojtech Mastny•Journal of Cold War Studies•2008

  • The Anthropocene

    Will Steffen, Paul J Crutzen et al.•AMBIO•2007

  • When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal

    Open Access•J Zalasiewicz, Colin N Waters et al.•Quaternary International•2015

  • The onset of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•B D Smith, M A Zeder•Anthropocene•2013

  • A sociometabolic reading of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Marina Fischer-Kowalski, Fridolin Krausmann et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2014

  • Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Matt Edgeworth, Dan Deb Richter et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2015

  • The trajectory of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Wendy Broadgate et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2015

  • Is there an isotopic signature of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Jonathan R Dean, Melanie J Leng et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2014

Unique citing works31
Citations per year2,82
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae