The limits of multiculturalism in Australia? The Shari'a flogging case of R v. Raad, Fayed, Cifci and Coskun
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4898988 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Selda Dagistanli (0000-0002-1895-8247, Western Sydney University, corresponding author), A Possamai (0000-0002-2825-936X, Western Sydney University), B Turner (0000-0001-6378-7144, University of Potsdam), Bryan S Turner (Australian Catholic University, Australia; Potsdam University, Germany), M Voyce (0000-0003-0972-7479, Macquarie University), Joshua M Roose (0000-0002-7689-9652, Australian Catholic University), Joshua Roose (Australian Catholic University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1258-1275 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Sociological Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0261 • E-ISSN: 1467-954X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0038026118768133 |
| OpenAlex | W2800264092 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
This article focuses on the marginal extremities - the limits - of Shari'a practices in Australia, through the example of a criminal case in which four Sydney-based Muslim men whipped a Muslim convert to punish him for his excessive consumption of drugs and alcohol. The men claimed they acted in line with the doctrines of Shari'a practice to 'purify' or absolve the victim of his sins. While the case was tried before a magistrate in a lower court, it is argued in this article that its social and political significance was wider, reaching into contemporary debates around multiculturalism and immigration from non-western, non-liberal and mainly Muslim nations. Mainstream media and political narratives viewed the whipping as an example of the moral dangers of accommodating Shari'a norms, eliding the differences between peaceable Shari'a and its violent extremities, while situating the case at the limits of multicultural accommodation. This article interrogates the objectionable margins of some cultural practices through this limit case. At the same time it questions the limits or limitations of a multiculturalism that homogeneously views the practices of entire ethnic or religious groups as violent and incommensurable with dominant norms, while using these understandings as a justification for marginalising these groups
Criminology · Immigration · Mainstream · Multiculturalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender Studies · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Epidermal growth factor receptor in human breast cancer
Comparative Law in a Global Context
The Multiculturalism Backlash
Rethinking Multiculturalism
White Nation
The New Integrationism, the State and Islamophobia
The crisis of ‘multiculturalism’ in Europe
Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law; Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century
The ‘Sharia Law Debate’ in Ontario
Shari’a and Everyday Life in Sydney
The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state
What Do We Mean By "Salafī"? Connecting Muḥammad ʿAbduh with Egypt's Nūr Party in Islam's Contemporary Intellectual History
Defining the conversation about Shari'a
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |