Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doing focus group research

Studying rational ordering in focus group interaction

Bibliographic Data

ID5965189
AuthorsLaura Bang Lindegaard (0000-0002-1563-7077, Aalborg University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume16
Issue5
Pages629-644
Publication date2014-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445614538563
OpenAlexW2045857689
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited48

Scholars of ethnomethodologically informed discourse studies are often sceptical of the use of interview data such as focus group data. Some scholars quite simply reject interview data with reference to a general preference for so-called naturally occurring data. Other scholars acknowledge that interview data can be of some use if the distinction between natural and contrived data is given up and replaced with a distinction between interview data as topic or as resource. In greater detail, such scholars argue that interview data are perfectly adequate if the researcher wants to study the topic of interview interaction, but inadequate as data for studying phenomena that go beyond the phenomenon of interview interaction. Neither of these more and less sceptical positions are, on the face of it, surprising due to the ethnomethodological commitment to study social order as accomplished in situ, not as something that pre-exists or goes beyond the situated interaction. This article, however, challenges not only the first, but also the second position and suggests that it is, after all, possible to do committedly ethnomethodological studies of focus group data that demonstrate how members of a focus group setting accomplish certain rational orders, and, significantly, how they do so by utilizing certain available resources

Conversation · Conversation analysis · Discourse analysis · Discursive psychology · Epistemology · Ethnomethodology · Focus group · Linguistics · Situated · Skepticism · Sociology · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Focus Group Discussions as Sites for Public Deliberation and Sensemaking Following Shared Political Documentary Viewing

    Open Access•Margaret J Pitts, Kate Kenski et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2017

  • Focus group interaction in evaluation research

    Hanbyul Jung•Applied Linguistics Review•2018

  • Actualizing societal membership in imaginary interaction

    Open Access•Hanna Rautajoki•Frontiers in Sociology•2023

  • Anti-coronas and germophobic neurotics

    Open Access•Laura Bang Lindegaard•Mobilities•2025

  • Click-guides and panic buttons

    Open Access•Sofia Lundmark, A C Evaldsson et al.•Childhood•2017

  • Interpreting qualitative data

    David Silverman•Interpreting qualitative data•2001

  • Talk and social structure

    Deirdre Boden•Talk and social structure•1993

  • Analysing Everyday Explanation

    Charles Antaki•Analysing Everyday Explanation•1988

  • Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action

    Open Access•Michael Lynch•Scientific Practice and Ordinary…•1994

  • Doing Conversation Analysis

    Paul Ten Have•Doing Conversation Analysis•2007

  • The Spectacle of History

    Open Access•Michael E Lynch, David Bogen•Spectacle of History•1996

  • Focus Group Practice

    Claudia Puchta, Jonathan Potter•Focus Group Practice•2004

  • Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview

    Open Access•Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra•Interaction and the Standardized…•2000

  • Values and moral judgement

    Open Access•Lena Jayyusi•Ethnomethodology and the Human…•1991

  • Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology

    John Heritage•Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology•2013

  • Sequence Organization in Interaction

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Sequence Organization in…•2007

  • Ontology or methodology

    Paul Ten Have•Discourse Studies•2002

  • Ethnic solidarity as interactional accomplishment

    Open Access•Liana Grancea•Discourse & Society•2010

  • Beyond armed camps

    Open Access•David J Silverman, David Silverman•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis

    Open Access•Maria T Wowk, Andrew P Carlin•Human Studies•2004

  • Natural Order

    Open Access•Jonathan Potter, Margaret Wetherell•Journal of Language and Social…•1995

  • Order, order

    Open Access•T Rapley•Discourse Studies•2012

  • The question–response system of Danish

    Open Access•T Heinemann•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Categorization and the moral order

    Lena Jayyusi•Categorization and the moral order•1984

  • Being dead and being there

    Open Access•Christine Griffin•Discourse Studies•2007

  • Transcending the `natural'/`contrived' distinction

    Open Access•Susan Speer, Susan A Speer•Discourse Studies•2002

  • Enriching CA through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys

    Open Access•R Gardner•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Membership categorization analysis

    Open Access•Richard Fitzgerald•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Moving forward by doing analysis

    Open Access•Kevin A Whitehead•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Natural' and `contrived' data

    Open Access•Susan Speer, Susan A Speer•Discourse Studies•2002

  • Questions of accountability

    Open Access•T Heinemann•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Moving forward with membership categorization analysis

    Open Access•E Stokoe•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Doing Data

    Stephen Hester, David Francis•British Journal of Sociology•1994

  • Grammar and Social Organization

    G Raymond•American Sociological Review•2003

  • Asking elaborate questions

    Open Access•Claudia Puchta, Jonathan Potter•Journal of Sociolinguistics•1999

  • Critique and description

    Open Access•A Mchoul, A W Mchoul•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • Social critique and the logic of description

    Open Access•David Bogen, Michael Lynch et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • A tutorial on membership categorization

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Journal of Pragmatics•2007

  • Language and the sociology of mind

    Open Access•A Mchoul, A W Mchoul•Journal of Pragmatics•1988

  • Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences

    Open Access•J Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen•Language in Society•1994

  • The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis

    Open Access•W Housley, Richard Fitzgerald•Qualitative Research•2002

  • The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing

    Open Access•T Rapley, Timothy John Rapley•Qualitative Research•2001

  • Harvey Sacks's Sociology of Mind in Action

    Open Access•Rod Watson•Theory Culture & Society•1994

  • Towards a Critical Ethnomethodology

    Open Access•Alec Mchoul•Theory Culture & Society•1994

  • Harvey Sacks's Primitive Natural Science

    Open Access•Michael Lynch, Michael S Lynch et al.•Theory Culture & Society•1994

  • The Getting of Sexuality

    Open Access•Alec Mchoul•Theory Culture & Society•1986

  • Ethnomethodology and Marxism

    Open Access•Peter Freund, Mona Abrams•Theory and Society•1976

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,56
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae