Speaking in the first-person singular or plural
A multifactorial, speech corpus-based analysis of institutional interpreters
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6152362 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nannan Liu (0000-0001-9235-2633, University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 239-273 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1384-6647 • E-ISSN: 1569-982X |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/intp.00088.liu |
| OpenAlex | W4306990266 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 29 |
Conventionally, the professional interpreter speaks in the first-person singular. Research in corpus-based discourse analysis has reported shifts from this norm towards first-person plural becoming the most frequent pronoun shift in political institutional interpreting, possibly signalling interpreter ‘alignment with the institution’. Nonetheless, few studies have teased apart the simultaneous constraints of social, cognitive, and linguistic factors on institutional interpreters’ preference for the plural. The present research adopts the usage-based theory to consider the three types of explanations together. It extends recent multivariate methodologies based on this theory to analyse 2,438 first-person cases in parallel interpreting and comparable speech corpora. Following robust context analyses and cross-linguistic prosodic transcription, this study weighs the strengths of 33 associates regarding the three explanations through regression analyses. The results show that first-person shifts are better explained by chunking effects when interpreters process complex forms and referents in the source and target speeches, and when they process zero-subject source inputs. The institutional alignment explanation fails to account for the extensive grammaticalisation of plural constructions in the interpreted speech. When all the interactive and additive effects are considered together, institutional alignment or monofactorial paradigms have little explanatory power. This study concludes by highlighting the relevance of usage-based multifactorial designs to interpreting research
Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology · Interpreter · Linguistics · Plural · Computer Science · History · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology
A grammar of spoken Chinese.
Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Language, Usage and Cognition
Typology and Universals
How to do Linguistics with R
Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars
A usage-based model
Intentions in Communication
The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse
A Corpus-Based Exploration Into Lexical Bundles in Interpreting
(Re-)voicing Beijing’s discourse through self-referentiality
On the need for a new research agenda for corpus-based translation studies
The cognitive load of interpreters in the European Parliament
Negotiating interpersonal relations in Chinese-English diplomatic interpreting
The impact of simultaneous-interpreting prosody on comprehension
What’s in a word? Your enemy combatant is my refugee
Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that)
(Generalized Linear) Mixed-Effects Modeling
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |