Vote Buying, Norms, Context, and Trust in Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6244993
AuthorsMollie J Cohen (0000-0002-5992-4713, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, corresponding author), Euiyoung Emily Noh (0000-0001-8115-7752, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA), Elizabeth J Zechmeister (0000-0002-9820-5674, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA)
Year2025
Volume58
Issue4
Pages647-679
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Political Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-4140 • E-ISSN: 1552-3829
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00104140241252099
OpenAlexW4398783168
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited103

Conventional wisdom says vote buying undermines trust in elections, but few have examined this systematically. We identify why this relationship ought to hold, on average. We also derive two conditioning hypotheses: vote buying will be less consequential among citizens who view these exchanges as positive and in contexts marred by electoral irregularities. We test these three expectations with analyses of cross-national survey data and an original survey experiment. We find only a small and inconsistent relationship between vote buying and electoral trust. We find weak evidence on the role of norms and more support for the notion that context matters. We conclude that a modest connection between vote buying and electoral trust is driven less by approval of vote buying practices and more by variation in how elections are actually conducted and, related, the relative novelty of being exposed to vote buying

Advertising · Business · Context (archaeology · Economics · Geography · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Politics and Society in Latin America · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology