Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Rethinking Critical Mass in the Federal Appellate Courts

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6409811
AutoresLaura P Moyer (0000-0002-5802-801X, University of Georgia, autor correspondente), Laura Moyer
Ano2013
Volume34
Fascículo1
Páginas49-71
Data de publicação2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1554477x.2013.747885
OpenAlexW2006744096
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas47

This article draws from critical mass studies of gender in other political institutions to inform an application to the US Courts of Appeals. The results demonstrate the utility of considering court-level aspects of diversity. As mixed-sex panels become more common within a circuit, both male and female judges increasingly support plaintiffs in civil rights claims, though the magnitude of the effect is larger for women. The presence of a female chief judge is also positively associated with pro-plaintiff decisions by men and women in sex discrimination cases

Critical mass (sociodynamics · Diversity (politics · Plaintiff · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • Delegation in a multi-tier court system

    Open Access•Roee Sarel, Melanie Demirtas•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • Does Descriptive Representation of Women on the Bench Improve Institutional Trust

    Open Access•Laura P Moyer•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • A retrospective on Obama’s judges

    Rorie Spill Solberg, Jennifer Segal Diascro•Politics Groups and Identities•2018

  • Trailblazer women in the Supreme Court of Canada

    Susan W Johnson, Ali S Masood•Politics Groups and Identities•2021

  • Diversity, consensus, and decision making

    Laura P Moyer, John Szmer et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2020

  • The impact of maleness on judicial decision making

    Rebecca D Gill, M Kagan et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2017

  • Trading Liberties for Security

    Open Access•Rebecca A Reid, Susanne Schorpp et al.•American Politics Research•2019

  • Perceptions of Legitimacy

    Open Access•Justine Tinkler, Justine E Tinkler et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2014

  • Multidimensional domestic gender inequality and the global diffusion of women’s ministries, 1975–2015

    Open Access•J Fernández J, Sílvia Claveria et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Representative bureaucracy in property assessment appeals administration

    Open Access•Sebawit Bishu, Geoffrey Propheter•Public Administration•2024

  • Gender Diversity, Women’s Leadership, and Consensus in State Supreme Courts

    Meghan E Leonard, Joseph V Ro•Women & Politics•2020

  • Well said

    Open Access•Shane A Gleason, Krystoff Kissoon•Law & Policy•2025

  • Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals

    Sean Farhang, Sara Farhang•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2004

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • Expectation States Theory

    J Correll, Shelley J Correll et al.•Handbook of Social Psychology…•2006

  • Relational demography within groups

    Christine M Riordan•Research in Personnel and Human…•2004

  • Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance

    Open Access•Rita Mae Kelly, Georgia Duerst-Lahti et al.•Gender power, leadership, and…•1995

  • Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in Arizona Legislature

    Open Access•Michelle A Saint‐germain, Axel A Elling et al.•1989

  • Gender Bias and Feminist Consciousness among Judges and Attorneys

    Patricia Yancey Martin, John R Reynolds et al.•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2002

  • Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success

    Open Access•Mary Glenn Wiley, Arlene Eskilson•Sex Roles•1985

  • Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups

    Open Access•Susan A Wheelan, Anthony F Verdi•Sex Roles•1992

  • In a Different Voice

    Miriam M Johnson, Carol Gilligan•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1983

  • Gender, Status, and Leadership

    Open Access•C L Ridgeway•Journal of Social Issues•2001

  • Picking Federal Judges

    Micheal W Giles, Virginia A Hettinger et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales

    Keith T Poole•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life

    Rosabeth Moss Kanter•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  • Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts

    Nancy Scherer, Brett Curry•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter's Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, Reginald S Sheehan et al.•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Interruptions in Group Discussions

    L Smith-Lovin, Charles J Brody et al.•American Sociological Review•1989

  • Handbook of social psychology

    Susan T Fiske, Daniel Todd Gilbert et al.•Handbook of social psychology•2010

  • A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts

    Donald R Songer, Sue Davis et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • The Diversification of the Federal Bench

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • From a Small to a Large Minority

    Open Access•Drude Dahlerup•Scandinavian Political Studies•1988

  • The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass

    Drude Dahlerup•Politics & Gender•2006

  • Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes

    Sarah Child, Sarah Childs et al.•Politics & Gender•2006

  • Critical Mass Theory Revisited

    Kathleen A Bratton•Politics & Gender•2005

  • Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation

    Open Access•Childs Sarah, Mona Lena Krook et al.•Political Studies•2008

  • Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Sarah Poggione•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench

    Open Access•Todd Collins, Todd A Collins et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Representative Decision Making on the Federal Bench

    Open Access•Jennifer A Segal•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Understanding Interaction Models

    Open Access•Thomas Brambor, William R Clark et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs

    Grey, Shane T Grey et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2002

  • Supreme Court Auditing of the US Courts of Appeals

    Stefanie A Lindquist, A Lindquist et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • Numbers and Newness

    Open Access•Karen Beckwith•Canadian Journal of Political…•2007

  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Lee Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Structuring Gender's Impact

    Open Access•Madhavi Mccall•American Politics Research•2008

  • Nonconformity, Competence, and Influence in Groups

    C L Ridgeway•American Sociological Review•1981

  • Gender and leadership style

    Alice H Eagly, Blair T Johnson•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking

    Open Access•Lyn Kathlene•American Political Science Review•1994

  • The Gender System and Interaction

    C L Ridgeway, L Smith-Lovin•Annual Review of Sociology•1999

Obras citantes distintas12
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2014 - 2025 (12)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 12
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae