Technical Note
Geometric morphometrics and sexual dimorphism of the greater sciatic notch in adults from two skeletal collections: The accuracy and reliability of sex classification
Bibliographic Data
The greater sciatic notch (GSN) is one of the most important and frequently used characteristics for determining the sex of skeletons, but objective assessment of this characteristic is not without its difficulties. We tested the robustness of GSN sex classification on the basis of geometric morphometrics (GM) and support vector machines (SVM), using two different population samples. Using photographs, the shape of the GSN in 229 samples from two assemblages (documented collections of a Euroamerican population from the Maxwell Museum, University of New Mexico, and a Hispanic population from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City) was segmented automatically and evaluated using six curve representations. The optimal dimensionality for each representation was determined by finding the best sex classification. The classification accuracy of the six curve representations in our study was similar but the highest and concurrently homologous cross‐validated accuracy of 92% was achieved for a pooled sample using Fourier coefficient and Legendre polynomial methods. The success rate of our classification was influenced by the number of semilandmarks or coefficients and was only slightly affected by GSN marginal point positions. The intrapopulation variability of the female GSN shape was significantly lower compared with the male variability, possibly as a consequence of the intense selection pressure associated with reproduction. Males were misclassified more often than females. Our results show that by using a suitable GSN curve representation, a GM approach, and SVM analysis, it is possible to obtain a robust separation between the sexes that is stable for a multipopulation sample. Am J Phys Anthropol 152:558‐565, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Biology · Morphometrics · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Population · Robustness (evolution) · Statistics · Support vector machine · Zoology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Demography · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Genetics · Mathematics · Morphological variations and asymmetry · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Revisión crítica de la utilización del ilion para el diagnóstico de sexo en restos esqueléticos de individuos subadultos mediante técnicas morfométricas
Estimating osteological sex using predictive geometric morphometric analyses of the greater sciatic notch
Assessing the Greater Sciatic Notch With 2‐D Shape Analysis for Sex Estimation
Directional asymmetry of upper limbs in a medieval population from Poland
Shape, size, and maturity trajectories of the human ilium
Testing landmark redundancy for sex‐based shape analysis of the adult human os coxa
Geometric morphometric analysis of the greater sciatic notch in South Africans
Support-Vector Networks
Linear Discrimination, Ordination, and the Visualization of Selection Gradients in Modern Morphometrics
A Female Homo erectus Pelvis from Gona, Ethiopia
A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone
Analysis of dimorphic structures of the human pelvis
Manufactured populations
Sex differences in the pubic bone
Parturition and pelvic changes
Variation in pelvic size between males and females
Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism
Greater sciatic notch morphology
A simple univariate technique for determining sex from fragmentary femora
Accuracy and direction of error in the sexing of the skeleton
Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples
DSP
Curvature of the greater sciatic notch in sexing the human pelvis
Body size and body shape in early hominins - implications of the Gona Pelvis
Sex differences in the sciatic notch of great apes and modern humans
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |