Sellars on Perceptual Knowledge

Bibliographic Data

ID8903239
AuthorsDaniel Kalpokas (0000-0001-6137-6990, corresponding author), Daniel Kalpokas Daniel Kalpokas
Year2017
Volume53
Issue3
Pages425-425
Publication date2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransactions of the Charles S Peirce Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-1774 • E-ISSN: 1558-9587
PublisherIndiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04
OpenAlexW2773640316
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited12

In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars's theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars's theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements

Criticism · Empiricism · Epistemology · Linguistics · Mythology · Order (exchange · Perception · Philosophy of science · Political science · Root (linguistics · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology