Cynthia D Mulrow

Datos Biográficos

ID3483591
NOMBRECynthia D Mulrow
NOMBRESCynthia D
APELLIDOMulrow
FIRMAMULROW C D
AFILIACIONESThe University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center
ORCID0000-0002-4768-4492
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS16
TOTAL DE CITAS0
TOTAL COMO AUTOR16
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1997
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2022
ÍNDICE H0

  • A declaração PRISMA 2020

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLERevista Panamericana de Salud…2022

    A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…

  • Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2021

  • Declaración PRISMA 2020

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLERevista Española de Cardiología…2021

    La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2021

  • PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, David Moher et al.ARTICLEBMJ2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEBMJ2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLESystematic Reviews2021

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Open AccessJan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2014

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Open AccessJan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2007

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Jan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEEpidemiology2007

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Open AccessJan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2007

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • Measuring Subclinical Disability in Older Mexican Americans

    Helen P Hazuda, Meghan B Gerety et al.ARTICLEPsychosomatic Medicine2002

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive list of adaptive strategies to prevent disability and use this information to devise a preliminary measure of subclinical disability (state of sustained independence in the presence of latent or manifest functional limitations) suitable for older Mexican Americans. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 community-dwelling Mexican American elders (> or =65 years …

  • From Understanding Health Care Provider Behavior to Improving Health Care

    Lisa V Rubenstein, Brian S Mittman et al.ARTICLEMedical Care2000Referencias: 36

    Basic science and health care research provide the evidence base for the scientific practice of medicine. Over the past 2 decades, as increasingly refined tools for improving health and health care have been developed, the health care community has attempted to bridge the gap between available tools and actual health care practices. This gap can be bridged only by influencing health care provider behavior. The VA Quality Enhancement Research Init…

  • Systematic Reviews

    Open AccessDeborah J Cook, Cynthia D Mulrow et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine1997

    Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing large bodies of evidence and helping to explain differences among studies on the same question. A systematic review involves the application of scientific strategies, in ways that limit bias, to the assembly, critical appraisal, and synthesis of all relevant studies that address a specific clinical question. A meta-analysis is a type of systematic revi…