Marco Mariotti
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 3604949 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Marco Mariotti |
| NOMBRES | Marco |
| APELLIDO | Mariotti |
| FIRMA | MARIOTTI M |
| AFILIACIONES | Queen Mary University of London |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5308-5154 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 11 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 24 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 11 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1995 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2022 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Sufficientarianism
Sufficientarianism is a prominent approach to distributive justice in political philosophy and in policy analyses. However, it is virtually absent from the formal normative economics literature. We analyze sufficientarianism axiomatically in the context of the allocation of 0–1 normalized well‐being in society. We present three characterizations of the core sufficientarian criterion, which counts the number of agents who attain a “good enough” le…
Mixture Choice Data
Mixture choice data consist of the joint distribution of choices of a group of agents from a collection of menus, comprising the implied stochastic choice function plus any cross-menu correlations. When agents are heterogeneous with respect to both preferences and other aspects of cognition, we show that these two determinants of behavior are identified simultaneously by suitable mixture choice data. We also demonstrate how this finding can be ex…
The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference
This article analyses the liberal ethics of non-interference in social choice. It examines a liberal principle that captures non-interfering views of society and is inspired by John Stuart Mill’s conception of liberty. The principle expresses the idea that society should not penalize individuals after changes in their situation that do not affect others. The article highlights an impossibility for liberal approaches: every social decision rule th…
Stochastic Complementarity
The Hicksian definition of complementarity and substitutability may not apply in contexts in which agents are not utility maximisers or where price or income vari- ations, whether implicit or explicit, are not available. We look for tools to identify complementarity and substitutability satisfying the following criteria: they are be- havioural (based only on observable choice data); model-free (valid whether the agent is rational or not); and the…
Opportunities as Chances
Opportunities in society are commonly interpreted as `chances of success'. Within this interpretation, should opportunities be equalised? We show that a liberal principle of justice and a limited principle of social rationality imply that opportunity profiles should be evaluated by means of a `Nash' criterion. The interpretation is new: the social objective should be to maximise the chance that everybody in society succeeds. In particular, the fa…
Competing for Attention
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be "tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alternatives. We investigate when competitive forces ensure instead that (strictly) higher salience is diagnostic of (strictly) higher quality, and the most frequently chosen alternative is the best one. We prov…
On the impossibility of complete Non-Interference in Paretian social judgements
CHAPTER 10 Choice over Time
This chapter reviews both the theoretical modeling and the experimental evidence, relating to choice over time. Most of the space is devoted to choices between outcome‐date pairs, which has been better studied, especially experimentally, but it also discusses choices between time sequences of outcomes. It distinguishes between “soft anomalies”, which can be accommodated by a simple modification of the standard exponential discounting model (e.g. …
Going Alone Together
Several contractual situations are such that the parties may 'step out' of negotiations and take up outside opportunities only if there is mutual consent to do so. Examples include employer - employee negotiations, divorce and inheritance procedures, and arbitration. To analyse such cases we develop the general concept of a 'joint outside option' and study its effect in the standard bargaining game. Examples from the international trade and theor…
Game Theory
Journal Article Game Theory: A Critical Introduction Get access Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. By (Shaun P.) Hargreaves and (Yanis). Varoufakis (London and New York: Routledge, 1995. Pp. xii+282. £50.00. hardback, £15.99 paperback. ISBN 0 415 09402 X, 0 415 09403 8.) Marco Mariotti Marco Mariotti University of Manchester Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 106, Issue 434, 1 …
Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality
Journal Article Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality? Get access Marco Mariotti Marco Mariotti Queen Mary and Westfield College, London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 105, Issue 432, 1 September 1995, Pages 1099–1109, https://doi.org/10.2307/2235406 Published: 01 September 1995
Game Theory
Journal Article Game Theory: A Critical Introduction Get access Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. By (Shaun P.) Hargreaves and (Yanis). Varoufakis (London and New York: Routledge, 1995. Pp. xii+282. £50.00. hardback, £15.99 paperback. ISBN 0 415 09402 X, 0 415 09403 8.) Marco Mariotti Marco Mariotti University of Manchester Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 106, Issue 434, 1 …
Opportunities as Chances
Opportunities in society are commonly interpreted as `chances of success'. Within this interpretation, should opportunities be equalised? We show that a liberal principle of justice and a limited principle of social rationality imply that opportunity profiles should be evaluated by means of a `Nash' criterion. The interpretation is new: the social objective should be to maximise the chance that everybody in society succeeds. In particular, the fa…
The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference
This article analyses the liberal ethics of non-interference in social choice. It examines a liberal principle that captures non-interfering views of society and is inspired by John Stuart Mill’s conception of liberty. The principle expresses the idea that society should not penalize individuals after changes in their situation that do not affect others. The article highlights an impossibility for liberal approaches: every social decision rule th…
Mixture Choice Data
Mixture choice data consist of the joint distribution of choices of a group of agents from a collection of menus, comprising the implied stochastic choice function plus any cross-menu correlations. When agents are heterogeneous with respect to both preferences and other aspects of cognition, we show that these two determinants of behavior are identified simultaneously by suitable mixture choice data. We also demonstrate how this finding can be ex…
Competing for Attention
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be "tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alternatives. We investigate when competitive forces ensure instead that (strictly) higher salience is diagnostic of (strictly) higher quality, and the most frequently chosen alternative is the best one. We prov…
Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality
Journal Article Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality? Get access Marco Mariotti Marco Mariotti Queen Mary and Westfield College, London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 105, Issue 432, 1 September 1995, Pages 1099–1109, https://doi.org/10.2307/2235406 Published: 01 September 1995
Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality
Journal Article Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality? Get access Marco Mariotti Marco Mariotti Queen Mary and Westfield College, London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 105, Issue 432, 1 September 1995, Pages 1099–1109, https://doi.org/10.2307/2235406 Published: 01 September 1995
Game Theory
Journal Article Game Theory: A Critical Introduction Get access Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. By (Shaun P.) Hargreaves and (Yanis). Varoufakis (London and New York: Routledge, 1995. Pp. xii+282. £50.00. hardback, £15.99 paperback. ISBN 0 415 09402 X, 0 415 09403 8.) Marco Mariotti Marco Mariotti University of Manchester Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 106, Issue 434, 1 …
Going Alone Together
Several contractual situations are such that the parties may 'step out' of negotiations and take up outside opportunities only if there is mutual consent to do so. Examples include employer - employee negotiations, divorce and inheritance procedures, and arbitration. To analyse such cases we develop the general concept of a 'joint outside option' and study its effect in the standard bargaining game. Examples from the international trade and theor…
CHAPTER 10 Choice over Time
This chapter reviews both the theoretical modeling and the experimental evidence, relating to choice over time. Most of the space is devoted to choices between outcome‐date pairs, which has been better studied, especially experimentally, but it also discusses choices between time sequences of outcomes. It distinguishes between “soft anomalies”, which can be accommodated by a simple modification of the standard exponential discounting model (e.g. …
On the impossibility of complete Non-Interference in Paretian social judgements
Opportunities as Chances
Opportunities in society are commonly interpreted as `chances of success'. Within this interpretation, should opportunities be equalised? We show that a liberal principle of justice and a limited principle of social rationality imply that opportunity profiles should be evaluated by means of a `Nash' criterion. The interpretation is new: the social objective should be to maximise the chance that everybody in society succeeds. In particular, the fa…
Competing for Attention
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be "tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alternatives. We investigate when competitive forces ensure instead that (strictly) higher salience is diagnostic of (strictly) higher quality, and the most frequently chosen alternative is the best one. We prov…
Stochastic Complementarity
The Hicksian definition of complementarity and substitutability may not apply in contexts in which agents are not utility maximisers or where price or income vari- ations, whether implicit or explicit, are not available. We look for tools to identify complementarity and substitutability satisfying the following criteria: they are be- havioural (based only on observable choice data); model-free (valid whether the agent is rational or not); and the…
The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference
This article analyses the liberal ethics of non-interference in social choice. It examines a liberal principle that captures non-interfering views of society and is inspired by John Stuart Mill’s conception of liberty. The principle expresses the idea that society should not penalize individuals after changes in their situation that do not affect others. The article highlights an impossibility for liberal approaches: every social decision rule th…
Sufficientarianism
Sufficientarianism is a prominent approach to distributive justice in political philosophy and in policy analyses. However, it is virtually absent from the formal normative economics literature. We analyze sufficientarianism axiomatically in the context of the allocation of 0–1 normalized well‐being in society. We present three characterizations of the core sufficientarian criterion, which counts the number of agents who attain a “good enough” le…
Mixture Choice Data
Mixture choice data consist of the joint distribution of choices of a group of agents from a collection of menus, comprising the implied stochastic choice function plus any cross-menu correlations. When agents are heterogeneous with respect to both preferences and other aspects of cognition, we show that these two determinants of behavior are identified simultaneously by suitable mixture choice data. We also demonstrate how this finding can be ex…
Economics (11 obras) · Mathematical economics (8 obras) · Political science (7 obras) · Computer Science (6 obras) · Law (6 obras) · Microeconomics (6 obras) · Epistemology (5 obras) · Law and economics (5 obras) · Positive economics (5 obras) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 obras)