Joseph Ignagni
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 4371919 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Joseph Ignagni |
| NOMBRES | Joseph |
| APELLIDO | Ignagni |
| FIRMA | IGNAGNI J |
| AFILIACIONES | The University of Texas at Arlington |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 7 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 61 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1993 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1997 |
| ÍNDICE H | 4 |
Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution
Theory: A Congress-centered model of coordinate construction of the Constitution is proposed to predict when legislation, that would reverse a decision of the Supreme Court, is brought to a vote in Congress. Hypotheses: Decision reversal of Supreme Court cases striking down law as unconstitutional are a function of federal power concerns, presidential position, the type of law struck down, public opinion, and interest group pressure. Methods: A t…
Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws
Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws
In recent years scholars of both the Supreme Court and the Congress have begun to devote increasing attention to congressional attempts to reverse Court decisions declaring federal statutes unconstitutional, while Court decisions involving state laws have not garnered nearly the same amount of attention. We know that the Court strikes down state laws with far greater frequency than federal laws and that many of the most contentious issues facing …
Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions
Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions
This research examines what factors are likely to cause the Congress to attempt to reverse Supreme Court decisions that hold federal laws unconstitutional during the Warren, Burger, and early years of the Rehnquist courts. First, we outline a general theory of congressional motivation to reverse Supreme Court decisions that looks to both electoral considerations and the need to safeguard congressional power as the primary motivating factors. Usin…
Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making
Journal Article Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making: The Burger Court's Establishment Clause Decisions Get access Joseph A. Ignagni Joseph A. Ignagni assistant professor of political science University of Texas at Arlington Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Church and State, Volume 36, Issue 2, Spring 1994, Pages 301–327, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/36.2.301 Published: 01 March…
U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making and the Free Exercise Clause
The U.S. Supreme Court, at various times, has changed the constitutional tests it claimed to use in order to settle free exercise of religion disputes. These changes in official doctrine and the manner in which many cases have been decided have left the Supreme Court open to much criticism from legal scholars. This study differs substantially from previous work in this area. It uses a fact-attitudinal model to analyze the cases from the Warren, B…
Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution
Theory: A Congress-centered model of coordinate construction of the Constitution is proposed to predict when legislation, that would reverse a decision of the Supreme Court, is brought to a vote in Congress. Hypotheses: Decision reversal of Supreme Court cases striking down law as unconstitutional are a function of federal power concerns, presidential position, the type of law struck down, public opinion, and interest group pressure. Methods: A t…
Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions
This research examines what factors are likely to cause the Congress to attempt to reverse Supreme Court decisions that hold federal laws unconstitutional during the Warren, Burger, and early years of the Rehnquist courts. First, we outline a general theory of congressional motivation to reverse Supreme Court decisions that looks to both electoral considerations and the need to safeguard congressional power as the primary motivating factors. Usin…
Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws
In recent years scholars of both the Supreme Court and the Congress have begun to devote increasing attention to congressional attempts to reverse Court decisions declaring federal statutes unconstitutional, while Court decisions involving state laws have not garnered nearly the same amount of attention. We know that the Court strikes down state laws with far greater frequency than federal laws and that many of the most contentious issues facing …
Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making
Journal Article Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making: The Burger Court's Establishment Clause Decisions Get access Joseph A. Ignagni Joseph A. Ignagni assistant professor of political science University of Texas at Arlington Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Church and State, Volume 36, Issue 2, Spring 1994, Pages 301–327, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/36.2.301 Published: 01 March…
U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making and the Free Exercise Clause
The U.S. Supreme Court, at various times, has changed the constitutional tests it claimed to use in order to settle free exercise of religion disputes. These changes in official doctrine and the manner in which many cases have been decided have left the Supreme Court open to much criticism from legal scholars. This study differs substantially from previous work in this area. It uses a fact-attitudinal model to analyze the cases from the Warren, B…
U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making and the Free Exercise Clause
The U.S. Supreme Court, at various times, has changed the constitutional tests it claimed to use in order to settle free exercise of religion disputes. These changes in official doctrine and the manner in which many cases have been decided have left the Supreme Court open to much criticism from legal scholars. This study differs substantially from previous work in this area. It uses a fact-attitudinal model to analyze the cases from the Warren, B…
Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions
Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions
This research examines what factors are likely to cause the Congress to attempt to reverse Supreme Court decisions that hold federal laws unconstitutional during the Warren, Burger, and early years of the Rehnquist courts. First, we outline a general theory of congressional motivation to reverse Supreme Court decisions that looks to both electoral considerations and the need to safeguard congressional power as the primary motivating factors. Usin…
Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making
Journal Article Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making: The Burger Court's Establishment Clause Decisions Get access Joseph A. Ignagni Joseph A. Ignagni assistant professor of political science University of Texas at Arlington Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Church and State, Volume 36, Issue 2, Spring 1994, Pages 301–327, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/36.2.301 Published: 01 March…
Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws
Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws
In recent years scholars of both the Supreme Court and the Congress have begun to devote increasing attention to congressional attempts to reverse Court decisions declaring federal statutes unconstitutional, while Court decisions involving state laws have not garnered nearly the same amount of attention. We know that the Court strikes down state laws with far greater frequency than federal laws and that many of the most contentious issues facing …
Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution
Theory: A Congress-centered model of coordinate construction of the Constitution is proposed to predict when legislation, that would reverse a decision of the Supreme Court, is brought to a vote in Congress. Hypotheses: Decision reversal of Supreme Court cases striking down law as unconstitutional are a function of federal power concerns, presidential position, the type of law struck down, public opinion, and interest group pressure. Methods: A t…
Law (7 obras) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 obras) · Political science (7 obras) · Supreme court (7 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 obras) · Law (6 obras) · Concurring opinion (5 obras) · Majority opinion (5 obras) · Original jurisdiction (5 obras) · Supreme Court Decisions (4 obras)