Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making and the Free Exercise Clause

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7416331
AutoresJoseph Ignagni (autor de correspondencia), Joseph A Ignagni
Año1993
Volumen55
Número3
Páginas511-529
Fecha de publicación1993-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670500017654
OpenAlexW2164783416
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas28

The U.S. Supreme Court, at various times, has changed the constitutional tests it claimed to use in order to settle free exercise of religion disputes. These changes in official doctrine and the manner in which many cases have been decided have left the Supreme Court open to much criticism from legal scholars. This study differs substantially from previous work in this area. It uses a fact-attitudinal model to analyze the cases from the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts. Its findings indicate that these decisions are, generally, explainable and predictable

Concurring opinion · Constitutional right · Court of record · Criticism · Doctrine · Economics · First amendment · Free Exercise Clause · Majority opinion · Order (exchange · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Remand (court procedure · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • An Informal and Limited Alliance”

    Open Access•Brett Curry, Brett W Curry et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Keepers of the Covenant or Platonic Guardians? Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Richard L Pacelle, Bryan W Marshall et al.•American Politics Research•2007

  • Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking

    Open Access•Herbert M Kritzer, Mark J Richards•Law & Society Review•2003

  • Religion and politics in the United States

    Kenneth D Wald•Religion and politics in the…•2007

  • The Cybernetic Theory of Decision

    John D Steinbruner, John Steinbruner•Cybernetic Theory of Decision•1974

  • Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models

    John Aldrich, John H Aldrich et al.•Linear Probability, Logit, and…•1984

  • Church-State Relationships in America

    Russell Hittinger, Gerard V Bradley•Journal of Law and Religion•1990

  • Toward Benevolent Neutrality

    Paul J Weber, Robert T Miller et al.•Journal of Law and Religion•1983

  • James Madison on Religious Liberty

    Robert L Spaeth, Robert S Alley•Journal of Law and Religion•1986

  • Models of Man

    Open Access•Martin Hollis•Models of Man•1977

  • Church-State Relationships in America

    Thomas D Hamm, Gerard V Bradley•Journal of the Early Republic•1988

  • A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables

    Richard D Mckelvey, William Zavoina•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975

  • The Tenth Justice

    Mark Tushnet, Lincoln Caplan•Journal of American History•1988

  • The Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions

    Open Access•Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Political Science Review•1984

  • The Constitution of Religion

    Open Access•Mark Tushnet•The Review of Politics•1988

  • Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers

    Jeffrey A Segal•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • Certiorari Decisions by the Warren & Burger Courts

    Virginia C Armstrong, Charles A Johnson•Polity•1982

  • Measuring Change on the Supreme Court

    Jeffrey A Segal•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Religion in Social Context

    Paul M Harrison, N J Demerath et al.•American Sociological Review•1969

  • Religious Marginality and the Free Exercise Clause

    Open Access•Frank Way, Barbara J Burt•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • Human Nature in Politics

    Open Access•Herbert A Simon•American Political Science Review•1985

  • Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1984

  • Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Mathematically

    Open Access•Fred Kort•American Political Science Review•1957

  • Religion in Social Context

    Joseph H Fichter, N J Demerath et al.•Sociological Analysis•1969

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,13
Intervalo de citas2003 - 2008 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae