Response Process in Judgmental Contrast
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10123919 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Robert E Hicks (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, autor de correspondencia), Marcel Kinsbourne (Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center), C Thomas Gualtieri (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) |
| Año | 1985 |
| Volumen | 112 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 79-87 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1985-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of General Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-1309 • E-ISSN: 1940-0888 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00221309.1985.9710991 |
| OpenAlex | W2076061629 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 7 |
College students ranked opposite-sex and same-sex celebrities on their attractiveness as potential partners for an evening (dateability) in Experiment 1 (n = 130). The opposite-sex rankings were used to establish three stimulus contexts varying in average dateability for each sex. Subjects then gave two types of magnitude estimations (line drawings and dollars) on the dateability of common stimulus names in the three contexts (Experiment 2, n = 117). Both types of magnitude estimations were inversely related to the average dateability of the entire ensemble; that is, judgmental contrast was demonstrated. Contrast was not, however, obtained in Experiment 3, when subjects (n = 43) made a between-sex celebrity-matching response on dateability. It was concluded that the observed contrast effects were due to contextual influences on response processes rather than perceptual processes
Attractiveness · Cognitive psychology · Contrast (vision · Perception · Stimulus (psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |