Conversational Exculpature
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10702147 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel Hoek (0000-0002-5331-2409, New York University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 127 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 151-196 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Philosophical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470 |
| Editorial | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00318108-4326594 |
| OpenAlex | W2800427342 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 20 |
| Referencias citadas | 40 |
Conversational exculpature is a pragmatic process whereby information is subtracted from, rather than added to, what the speaker literally says. This pragmatic content subtraction explains why we can say “Rob is six feet tall” without implying that Rob is between 5 ′11.99′′ and 6 ′0.01′′ tall, and why we can say “Ellen has a hat like the one Sherlock Holmes always wears” without implying Holmes exists or has a hat. This article presents a simple formalism for understanding this pragmatic mechanism, specifying how, in context, the result of such subtractions is determined. And it shows how the resulting theory of conversational exculpature accounts for a varied range of linguistic phenomena. A distinctive feature of the approach is the crucial role played by the question under discussion in determining the result of a given exculpature
Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · Linguistics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy
Putting oughts together
On proper presupposition
Nonexistence and Aboutness
The case for comparability
Fictionalism about Chatbots
Meaning and responsibility
A semantic theory of redundancy
Absolute gradable adjectives and loose talk
How to make people do things with words
Excluded entailments and the de se/de re partition
Common Ground
How do instructions help us make rational decisions
Co‐Identification and Fictional Names
Partial understanding
Interval-based dynamics of loose talk
Lying by explaining
Inquisitive injustice
Non-literal lies are not exculpatory
What’s your Opinion? Negation and ‘Weak’ Attitude Verbs
Inferences from Utterance to Belief
Semantic Relationism
Conversational Impliciture
Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference
Iii.—on Referring
Scorekeeping in a language game
Questions
The Myth of the Seven
Homogeneity, Non-Maximality, and all
Presupposition and Linguistic Context
Relevant implication
Parts and Partitions
Information structure in discourse
How Metaphors Work
Individuation by Acquaintance and by Stipulation
Action and Subtraction
Reference and Definite Descriptions
Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences
Introduction to Logical Theory
Mimesis as Make-Beleive
Inquisitive Semantics
Pragmatic Halos
| Obras citantes distintas | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 18 |