Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

What’s your Opinion? Negation and ‘Weak’ Attitude Verbs

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10687874
AutoresHerbert I Schiller (0000-0001-7229-9337, University of Sheffield, autor de correspondencia), Henry Ian Schiller (The University of Sheffield , UK)
Año2023
Volumen73
Número4
Páginas1141-1161
Fecha de publicación2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pq/pqad049
OpenAlexW4367680153
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas17

Attitude verbs like ‘believe’ and ‘want’ exhibit neg-raising: an ascription of the form a doesn’t believe that p tends to convey that a disbelieves—i.e., believes the negation of—p. In ‘Belief is Weak’, Hawthore et al. observe that neg-raising does not occur with verbs like ‘know’ or ‘need’. According to them, an ascription of the form a believes that p is true just in case a is in a belief state that makes p more likely than not, and so—excepting cases of complete indifference—a will either believe p or disbelieve p. I expand and revise this explanation: so-called ‘weak’ attitude verbs are used in ascriptions of an opinion about some subject matter S—a kind of selection from among the elements of S—and these ascriptions are themselves responsive to conversational topics that presuppose that the subject of the ascription has an opinion about S. ‘Strong’ attitude verbs denote more direct relationships between subject and world

Ascription · Epistemology · Linguistics · Negation · Raising (metalworking) · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Subject (documents) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Advocacy and the function of folk psychology

    Open Access•Herbert I Schiller•Mind & Language•2026

  • Classical NEG Raising

    Chris Collins, Paul M Postal•Classical Neg Raising An Essay On…•2014

  • Belief is weak

    Open Access•John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild et al.•Philosophical Studies•2016

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • A New Hope

    Kyle Blumberg, John Hawthorne et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Conversational Exculpature

    Daniel Hoek•The Philosophical Review•2018

  • The Attitudes We Can Have

    Daniel Drucker•The Philosophical Review•2020

  • Full Belief and Loose Speech

    Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•The Philosophical Review•2019

  • Belief as Question‐Sensitive

    Open Access•Seth Yalcin•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • Knowing the Answer

    Open Access•Jonathan Schaffer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2007

  • Pragmatic Particularism

    Open Access•Ray Buchanan, Herbert I Schiller•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Neg-Raising and Neg movement

    Open Access•Paul Crowley•Natural Language Semantics•2019

  • A Question-Sensitive Theory of Intention

    Open Access•Bob Beddor, Simon Goldstein•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae