King John's Reaction to the Interdict on England
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11005679 |
|---|---|
| Autores | C R Cheney (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1949 |
| Volumen | 31 |
| Páginas | 129-150 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1949-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0080-4401 • E-ISSN: 1474-0648 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3678638 |
| OpenAlex | W2139488750 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 1 |
Giraldus Cambrensis observed that the interdict laid on England in 1208 inflicted a double wound, involving as it did both the withdrawal of divine service and the plundering of the clergy's possessions. The eagerness of King John in exploiting the situation for his financial profit does not admit of doubt. The estimate of reparations for ablata and dampna arrived at in 1214 was 100,000 marks; this did not satisfy the clergy, and probably the sum was too small to cover all that the king had received by confiscations, prolonging of vacancies, dona , and fines. Although even an approximately correct estimate is now unattainable, an enquiry is still worth while to discover the king's policy and his methods of exaction during the interdict. This paper is primarily concerned with his general seizure of church property in 1208
Economics · Law and economics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Profit (economics · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,03 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1960 - 1982 (23) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |