Long-term and decentred trajectories of doing history from a global perspective
Institutionalization, postcolonial critique, and empiricist approaches, before and after the 1970s
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12876357 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Katja Naumann (Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture of Eastern Europe (GWZO), autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 14 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 335-354 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-10-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Global History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1740-0228 • E-ISSN: 1740-0236 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1740022819000159 |
| OpenAlex | W2981732272 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 41 |
Notions of the ‘global’ in historiography have a long tradition, and yet they appear to be a novelty. This article shows how older understandings of world history, imbued with Eurocentric presuppositions and universalist metaphysical reasoning, were questioned and revised in a long-term process. Recent criticism of Eurocentrism, linked with postcolonial scholarship, and the development of source-based approaches to study global connections and comparisons are usually recognized as innovations that took shape since the 1970s. In fact, they are rooted in profound conceptual revisions and academic institutionalization, which began much earlier. Based on the development of the field of world history in the United States, this article argues that concepts for a multipolar, interactive, and transcultural history developed from a dialectical and critical move away from older narratives. Historians and area specialists have wrestled for at least half a century with questions and problems that were rediscovered in the global turn of the 1980s and 1990s. Furthermore, the example shows that the field developed in specific trajectories, reflecting local and national institutional academic circumstances, as well as specific socio-political contexts
Conceptual history · Dialectic · Empiricism · Epistemology · Eurocentrism · Field (mathematics · Historiography · Institutionalisation · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Presupposition · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · World history · Anthropology · Asian Studies and History · Australian History and Society · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · History · Law · Philosophy
Writing the Nation
A Companion to World History
Writing the History of the Global
Writing world history
The Cambridge World History
What Is Global History?
The ethnographer's magic and other essays in the history of anthropology
Rethinking World History
The Spatial Turn
Terms
Hemispheric Interregional History as an Approach to World History
The Oxford History of Historical Writing
Postcolonialism
The Cambridge World History
What Is Global History
Global History, Globally
Transcultural History
Performing the World
Conceptualizing Global History
The Rise and Fall of the Western Civilization Course
Universal History From Counter-Reformation to Enlightenment
History on Trial
The Routledge Handbook of Transregional Studies
William H. McNeill
La notion de transfert culturel
Historiographical traditions and modern imperatives for the restoration of global history
Beyond Comparison
An Anthropologist among the Historians
Conceptualizing Global History
Robert Redfield and the Development of American Anthropology
Multiculturalism and the Politics of General Education
Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies
The Interrelations of Societies in History
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |