Platform capitalism and the erosion of public care
Digital home-visit elderly care in South Korea
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12911136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jae Jeong Lee (Chung-Ang University), Sophia Seung-Yoon Lee (0000-0003-3571-3425, Chung-Ang University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Páginas | 1-18 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-03-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Asian Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1751-6242 • E-ISSN: 1751-6234 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17516234.2026.2645429 |
| OpenAlex | W7138975685 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
Digital platforms are rapidly entering publicly financed care systems, yet how they reshape the public character of welfare services remains poorly understood. This study examines digital home-visit care platforms (DHVCPs) in South Korea, where universal Long-Term Care Insurance provides public financing but service delivery operates through a highly fragmented market of small private agencies. Drawing on Bozeman’s publicness framework, we analyse how platform-mediated care affects both dimensional publicness – the degree of governmental authority over service provision – and normative publicness — organizational commitment to values such as equity, transparency, and relational continuity. Using mixed methods combining venture capital investment analysis with semi-structured stakeholder interviews, we identify three reinforcing mechanisms through which platformisation erodes publicness: algorithmic opacity that severs accountability linkages; financialised growth imperatives that subordinate care quality to investor-driven scaling; and regulatory misalignment that enables platforms to exploit institutional gaps. Our analysis extends Bozeman’s framework by proposing three additional dimensions for theorizing publicness in digital welfare states. The Korean case demonstrates that universal public financing alone cannot preserve publicness when service delivery is susceptible to platform intermediation.
Capitalism · Elderly Care · Elderly people · Erosion · Public policy · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Technology Use by Older Adults
Social Desirability Bias
Humans as a Service
A taxonomy of business models of digital care platforms in Spain
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Paradoxes of Gender in Elderly Care
Does Investor Ownership of Nursing Homes Compromise the Quality of Care
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Putting Together the Publicness Puzzle
Theorising the gig economy and home-based service work
Platform labor
Making sense of financialization
Who Bears the Burden of a Pandemic? Covid-19 and the Transfer of Risk to Digital Platform Workers
Means of Control in the Organization of Digitally Intermediated Care Work
Researching Care Platforms
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |